Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flying.Fonz - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    I found this old JPG and did some minor work to it. Could I check if it is good enough to upload please.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Transavia 738 PH-HSG MUC Champions League 19-05-2012.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	954.2 KB
ID:	1095016

    Cheers
    Would definitely avoid uploading at 1920. The lack of quality is evident at that resolution.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    I found this old JPG and did some minor work to it. Could I check if it is good enough to upload please.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP Transavia 738 PH-HSG MUC Champions League 19-05-2012.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	954.2 KB
ID:	1095016

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I did but it’s been a couple of days since I did and yet to hear back either way. I was going to submit it again so wanted to check if this is acceptable or if I should continue to wait.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Your thoughts on this rejection please.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8264634

    The intent was to show a pre entry into service of a brand new aircraft, in a similar way as this other one of mine as well as other equivalent ones online.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9615085

    I submitted an appeal but I didn’t hear back.

    I’d like to understand why one is a rejection but the other one isn’t as they have the same obstruction.

    Thanks
    If you've already appealed, I won't comment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Your thoughts on this rejection please.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8264634

    The intent was to show a pre entry into service of a brand new aircraft, in a similar way as this other one of mine as well as other equivalent ones online.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9615085

    I submitted an appeal but I didn’t hear back.

    I’d like to understand why one is a rejection but the other one isn’t as they have the same obstruction.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Ah, I wondered about that but hadn’t made the connection. Makes sense and I’ll work on it.

    Thanks for your thoughts.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    I can’t appeal it as the centreing remains an issue. But when I resubmit the corrected version, do I simply make a statement that it is not backlit in order to avoid that readong bring incorrectly applied again?

    Thanks
    You could leave a comment sure, but I think the screener who rejected it for backlit probably had an issue with the contrast, but mistook it for being backlit. As such, I couldn't guarantee the outcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    I can’t appeal it as the centreing remains an issue. But when I resubmit the corrected version, do I simply make a statement that it is not backlit in order to avoid that readong bring incorrectly applied again?

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    some advice please on this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8269337

    Regarding the centreing, I suspect the it is meant vertically as it is laterally centred.

    Im not sure how the photo is backlit but happy to hear why it is. The sun at that time of the day can only be and is high on the left and shining on the fuselage and the clouds. The shadows show that too.

    Thanks
    Can't say that it's backlit, but it is too high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    some advice please on this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8269337

    Regarding the centreing, I suspect the it is meant vertically as it is laterally centred.

    Im not sure how the photo is backlit but happy to hear why it is. The sun at that time of the day can only be and is high on the left and shining on the fuselage and the clouds. The shadows show that too.

    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi,

    Im working thorugh this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8248639

    and looking for advice on both reasons. Reviewing the detail of the photo, my assumption is that the first one is caused by the second one. Is this correct? and if not, what is the advice.

    Secondly, the photo is equivalent to the real event so looking to understand what the issue is with 'Bad Colour'.

    Many thanks
    Color would be ok for me, though the contrast is a bit washed out and too much vignetting correction has been applied.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Hi,

    Im working thorugh this rejection.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8248639

    and looking for advice on both reasons. Reviewing the detail of the photo, my assumption is that the first one is caused by the second one. Is this correct? and if not, what is the advice.

    Secondly, the photo is equivalent to the real event so looking to understand what the issue is with 'Bad Colour'.

    Many thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Flying.Fonz
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    Framing is acceptable, the heat distortion a bit too strong for my liking.
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Flying.Fonz View Post
    Hi, is this slight off-centre photo acceptable? If centred, there will be too much dead space. Also, is the heat haze acceptable?


    Click image for larger version

Name:	JP AC 773 C-FITU LHR 09L takeoff 01-06-20.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	1.68 MB
ID:	1092267

    Cheers
    Framing is acceptable, the heat distortion a bit too strong for my liking.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X