Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: soft, lack of contrast, too high in the frame
    2,4: lack of contrast
    3: OK
    does 2 and 4 look better? thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	390 C-FXJF 2018FE CYUL DSC_0330_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	591.1 KB
ID:	1032227Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FTQK 2018 CYUL DSC_0828_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	483.4 KB
ID:	1032228

    Comment


    • Hi, adding 2 pictures to the previous ones, thank you
      Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FSOU 2017DE20 CYUL DSC_2849_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	720.6 KB
ID:	1032281Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FCLS 2018JL CYUL DSC_6801_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	383.9 KB
ID:	1032282

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
        Hi, adding 2 pictures to the previous ones, thank you
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]21016[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21017[/ATTACH]
        1. borderline contrast/cut off
        2. dirty
        3-4 ok

        Comment


        • Hi, is these shots aceptable? thank you
          Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GWSA 2017 CYUL DSC_0749_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	508.9 KB
ID:	1032288Click image for larger version

Name:	XA-AMO DSC_0807.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.4 KB
ID:	1032289

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
            Hi, is these shots aceptable? thank you
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]21023[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21024[/ATTACH]
            1. ok
            2. contrast

            Comment


            • Thanks a lot. this one was rejected for drak/underexposure and category wrong or missing.
              JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

              I re worked the exposure does it look fine now? also, this is a regular airline so I am not sure about the wrong category, what do you think? Thanks
              Click image for larger version

Name:	646 C-GDUZ 2019JA02 CYUL DSC_2982_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.5 KB
ID:	1032312

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                Thanks a lot. this one was rejected for drak/underexposure and category wrong or missing.
                JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

                I re worked the exposure does it look fine now? also, this is a regular airline so I am not sure about the wrong category, what do you think? Thanks
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]21051[/ATTACH]
                Tail area still soft. This qualifies as a Night Shot.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  Tail area still soft. This qualifies as a Night Shot.
                  last try, what do you think? adding one more where I have a doubt with levels, thank you
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	646 C-GDUZ 2019JA02 CYUL DSC_2982_1200_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	407.2 KB
ID:	1032316Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3581.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	719.1 KB
ID:	1032317

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                    last try, what do you think? adding one more where I have a doubt with levels, thank you
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21055[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21056[/ATTACH]
                    1. still borderline soft tail
                    2. levelling looks fine

                    Comment


                    • Hi, is this picture acceptable? motive: motivation of a spotter at sunrise by a freezing -30C, thank you
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	N169GJ 2019JA12 CYUL DSC_3809_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	447.5 KB
ID:	1032340

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                        Hi, is this picture acceptable? motive: motivation of a spotter at sunrise by a freezing -30C, thank you
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]21080[/ATTACH]
                        No, would be rejected for centering and too far.

                        Comment


                        • Hi, I am not sure if the angle (and maybe other issues?) is fine, what do you think? thank you
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-BEB 2017OC25 CYUL DSC_8680_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.7 KB
ID:	1032479

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                            Hi, I am not sure if the angle (and maybe other issues?) is fine, what do you think? thank you
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]21239[/ATTACH]
                            Borderline cut off, and horizon looks questionable as well.

                            Comment


                            • thank you. how abou this one please? (unlucky with thw weather...)
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	HZ-AQ22 2018DE DTTA DSC_0096_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	444.5 KB
ID:	1032507

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Riadh View Post
                                thank you. how abou this one please? (unlucky with thw weather...)
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]21269[/ATTACH]
                                Would be rejected for dark/contrast.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X