Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, I am not sure if the angle (and maybe other issues?) is fine, what do you think? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21239[/ATTACH]
    Borderline cut off, and horizon looks questionable as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, I am not sure if the angle (and maybe other issues?) is fine, what do you think? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	A7-BEB 2017OC25 CYUL DSC_8680_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.7 KB
ID:	1032479

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, is this picture acceptable? motive: motivation of a spotter at sunrise by a freezing -30C, thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21080[/ATTACH]
    No, would be rejected for centering and too far.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, is this picture acceptable? motive: motivation of a spotter at sunrise by a freezing -30C, thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N169GJ 2019JA12 CYUL DSC_3809_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	447.5 KB
ID:	1032340

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    last try, what do you think? adding one more where I have a doubt with levels, thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21055[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21056[/ATTACH]
    1. still borderline soft tail
    2. levelling looks fine

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Tail area still soft. This qualifies as a Night Shot.
    last try, what do you think? adding one more where I have a doubt with levels, thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	646 C-GDUZ 2019JA02 CYUL DSC_2982_1200_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	407.2 KB
ID:	1032316Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3581.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	719.1 KB
ID:	1032317

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Thanks a lot. this one was rejected for drak/underexposure and category wrong or missing.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7047853
    I re worked the exposure does it look fine now? also, this is a regular airline so I am not sure about the wrong category, what do you think? Thanks
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21051[/ATTACH]
    Tail area still soft. This qualifies as a Night Shot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Thanks a lot. this one was rejected for drak/underexposure and category wrong or missing.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7047853
    I re worked the exposure does it look fine now? also, this is a regular airline so I am not sure about the wrong category, what do you think? Thanks
    Click image for larger version

Name:	646 C-GDUZ 2019JA02 CYUL DSC_2982_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.5 KB
ID:	1032312

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, is these shots aceptable? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21023[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21024[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, is these shots aceptable? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GWSA 2017 CYUL DSC_0749_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	508.9 KB
ID:	1032288Click image for larger version

Name:	XA-AMO DSC_0807.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.4 KB
ID:	1032289

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, adding 2 pictures to the previous ones, thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21016[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21017[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline contrast/cut off
    2. dirty
    3-4 ok

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, adding 2 pictures to the previous ones, thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FSOU 2017DE20 CYUL DSC_2849_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	720.6 KB
ID:	1032281Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FCLS 2018JL CYUL DSC_6801_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	383.9 KB
ID:	1032282

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    1: soft, lack of contrast, too high in the frame
    2,4: lack of contrast
    3: OK
    does 2 and 4 look better? thanksClick image for larger version

Name:	390 C-FXJF 2018FE CYUL DSC_0330_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	591.1 KB
ID:	1032227Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FTQK 2018 CYUL DSC_0828_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	483.4 KB
ID:	1032228

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please check these pictures, thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]20941[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20942[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20943[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]20944[/ATTACH]
    1: soft, lack of contrast, too high in the frame
    2,4: lack of contrast
    3: OK

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, can you please check these pictures, thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	212 C-FFWN 2018 CYUL DSC_5652_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	858.5 KB
ID:	1032223Click image for larger version

Name:	390 C-FXJF 2018FE CYUL DSC_0330_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	563.0 KB
ID:	1032224Click image for larger version

Name:	934 C-GFUR 2018 CYUL DSC_5639_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	941.7 KB
ID:	1032225Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FTQK 2018 CYUL DSC_0828_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	425.7 KB
ID:	1032226

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X