Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. soft, centering, borderline dark
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft/blurry
    4. borderline contrast
    4-in this case should i decrease contrast ?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Thanks, how about these ones?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18222[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18223[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18224[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18225[/ATTACH]
    1. soft, centering, borderline dark
    2. borderline soft
    3. soft/blurry
    4. borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Thanks, how about these ones?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GOHB CYUL DSC_7458_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	563.8 KB
ID:	1029994Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GOHI CYUL 2018DSC_4287.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	810.3 KB
ID:	1029995Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GOWO DSC_5087.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	570.6 KB
ID:	1029996Click image for larger version

Name:	9H-VJM 2017 CYUL DSC_2632_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	913.9 KB
ID:	1029997

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please check if there are any issues? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]18201[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18202[/ATTACH]
    1. overprocessed
    2. contrast, overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, can you please check if there are any issues? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GOWO 2018AU20 CYUL DSC_5085_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	493.7 KB
ID:	1029981Click image for larger version

Name:	CAF 749 DSC_3817.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.75 MB
ID:	1029982

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
    No, you shot was rejected, because it is slightly too low, also compared to the shot you are referring to. We do not compare to other photographers uploads during screening.
    Oh, OK, I got it, thank you for the clarification (too low)

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, I got one picture rejected for being not centered (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6728862), which I agree even if it was the best way to crop the image, but the rules are the rules right? I checked the registration and found almost the same shot with the same angle and the same crop approved (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8827265). I did not notice that before uploading, otherwise I wouldn't uplaod. Saying this, do you think this is why it was rejected ? (because of the accepted one?) thanks
    No, you shot was rejected, because it is slightly too low, also compared to the shot you are referring to. We do not compare to other photographers uploads during screening.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, I got one picture rejected for being not centered (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6728862), which I agree even if it was the best way to crop the image, but the rules are the rules right? I checked the registration and found almost the same shot with the same angle and the same crop approved (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8827265). I did not notice that before uploading, otherwise I wouldn't uplaod. Saying this, do you think this is why it was rejected ? (because of the accepted one?) thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Cockpit shots still a bit dark, and wing view a bit soft, but may be acceptable.

    In the future, please try to avoid adding comments like "was given ok in prescreening forum" to your uploads. Opinions here are just that, opinions, and will not bear any influence on whoever ends up screening the images.
    Thanks for the advices on the pictures this help me getting better and i am still learning.
    Yes, sure please note i stopped writing it in the comments since the latest ones uploaded but be sure i Will continue looking for your comments on the forum ☺

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    And now please? adding 2 pictures, thank you [ATTACH=CONFIG]17756[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17757[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17758[/ATTACH]
    Cockpit shots still a bit dark, and wing view a bit soft, but may be acceptable.

    In the future, please try to avoid adding comments like "was given ok in prescreening forum" to your uploads. Opinions here are just that, opinions, and will not bear any influence on whoever ends up screening the images.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    A bit dark, but level looks ok.
    And now please? adding 2 pictures, thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	134235 DSC_4071_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	867.2 KB
ID:	1029610Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FKCO CYWG 2018AU07 DSC_3550_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1029611Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FKCO DSC_3543_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	664.7 KB
ID:	1029612

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, I have a little trouble with this, especially level, can you please advice? thanks
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17743[/ATTACH]
    A bit dark, but level looks ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, I have a little trouble with this, especially level, can you please advice? thanks
    Click image for larger version

Name:	134235 DSC_4071_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	839.4 KB
ID:	1029599

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
    It does indeed
    Thanks a lot

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Does 1 look better now? thanks[ATTACH=CONFIG]17654[/ATTACH]
    It does indeed

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X