Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Riadh - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Is it better now? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16939[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16940[/ATTACH]
    Better, but almost a little too much correction. Both seem a bit brighter as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. color (greenish cast)
    2. better, but slight magenta cast
    3. ok for me
    Is it better now? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL09 CYUL DSC_9881_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	603.1 KB
ID:	1028977Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0226_1200_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	636.6 KB
ID:	1028978

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    And how about now?[ATTACH=CONFIG]16933[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16931[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16932[/ATTACH]
    1. color (greenish cast)
    2. better, but slight magenta cast
    3. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. ok
    2. color, borderline overexposed/soft
    3. color
    4. borderline overexposed
    And how about now?Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL09 CYUL DSC_9881_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	577.0 KB
ID:	1028971Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0226_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	584.7 KB
ID:	1028969Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HRBE 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0216_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	538.7 KB
ID:	1028970

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, can you please pre screen these? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16913[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16914[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16915[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]16916[/ATTACH]
    1. ok
    2. color, borderline overexposed/soft
    3. color
    4. borderline overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, can you please pre screen these? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	XA-WAB 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0302_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	421.7 KB
ID:	1028951Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL09 CYUL DSC_9884_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	624.2 KB
ID:	1028952Click image for larger version

Name:	CN-RGA 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0226_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	619.3 KB
ID:	1028953Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HRBE 2018JL10 CYUL DSC_0216_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	584.8 KB
ID:	1028954

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    how about now? any suggestion is very welcome, thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16845[/ATTACH]
    Still borderline overexposed/harsh contrast.

    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Final try, thanks [ATTACH=CONFIG]16846[/ATTACH]
    this one was borderline soft too, is it better now? thanks [ATTACH=CONFIG]16847[/ATTACH]
    last private, thanks a lot [ATTACH=CONFIG]16848[/ATTACH]
    1. borderline soft
    2. ok
    3. borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Quite soft.
    Final try, thanks Click image for larger version

Name:	N531AF 2018JN08 CYUL DSC_5998_1250_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	653.8 KB
ID:	1028889
    this one was borderline soft too, is it better now? thanks Click image for larger version

Name:	N-581FX 2018MA01 CYUL DSC_1211_1250_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	595.0 KB
ID:	1028890
    last private, thanks a lot Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GTLP 2018AL05 CYUL DSC_7053_1250_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	632.9 KB
ID:	1028891

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
    i would reject it for contrast
    how about now? any suggestion is very welcome, thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GNGC 2018JL07 LACHINE DSC_9415_1200_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1028888

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    try # 2 [ATTACH=CONFIG]16837[/ATTACH]
    i would reject it for contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Thanks i usually dont exceed 70% at 1 when sharpening to avoid over sharpness....never gone further but never tried at 0.2
    try # 2
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    Hi,

    IMHO the image still soft. I've applied 120% and 0,2 radius in your image and got better results. Also you can use the PS sharpen tool to apply some sharpness in specific areas

    Just my point of view, but wait more comments from the crew.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius
    Thanks i usually dont exceed 70% at 1 when sharpening to avoid over sharpness....never gone further but never tried at 0.2

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by Riadh View Post
    Hi, I used this time a tripod, it was pre screened previuosly soft (without a tripod), what do you think for this one? thank you
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16834[/ATTACH]
    Hi,

    IMHO the image still soft. I've applied 120% and 0,2 radius in your image and got better results. Also you can use the PS sharpen tool to apply some sharpness in specific areas

    Just my point of view, but wait more comments from the crew.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Hi, I used this time a tripod, it was pre screened previuosly soft (without a tripod), what do you think for this one? thank you
    Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GNGC 2018JL07 LACHINE DSC_9415_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1028878

    Leave a comment:


  • Riadh
    replied
    Originally posted by Stephan Rossouw View Post
    N111MD is Blurry to me.

    M-BLUE is much better, but will be rejected for Overprocessing (Halo's around the wings)
    Thanks Stephan

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X