Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

federbear - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    I have got this reject. Could you explain a bit more about it?

    I think that the reflection of the grass on the bottom of the wing should not lead to this reject.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9449435

    thx in advance!
    Not sure exactly. Is the fuselage supposed to be white or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    I have got this reject. Could you explain a bit more about it?

    I think that the reflection of the grass on the bottom of the wing should not lead to this reject.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9449435

    thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AEAC.JPG
Views:	164
Size:	485.5 KB
ID:	1121011

    Hi!

    Please check this picture. Is it ok? I uploaded first checking its histogram, and it looks like that the right end of the histogram does not ok, but I do not think it would be better using more whites/exposure, because the sky or the body of the aircraft would burn out.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AEAC-H.JPG
Views:	148
Size:	19.0 KB
ID:	1121012

    What do you think about it? It is a night shot.

    Thx in advance.
    Maybe a bit dark, but just needs a slight adjustment.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AEAC.JPG
Views:	164
Size:	485.5 KB
ID:	1121011

    Hi!

    Please check this picture. Is it ok? I uploaded first checking its histogram, and it looks like that the right end of the histogram does not ok, but I do not think it would be better using more whites/exposure, because the sky or the body of the aircraft would burn out.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AEAC-H.JPG
Views:	148
Size:	19.0 KB
ID:	1121012

    What do you think about it? It is a night shot.

    Thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Is this picture would be duplicate of https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10067812 ?

    Accelerating v. landing phase.

    Thix in advance.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	ET-AVN.JPG
Views:	47
Size:	783.7 KB
ID:	1119528
    Looks like different dates, so should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    Is this picture would be duplicate of https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10067812 ?

    Accelerating v. landing phase.

    Thix in advance.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	ET-AVN.JPG
Views:	47
Size:	783.7 KB
ID:	1119528

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9017389

    I do not know what was wrong in the data at the upload. Actually I did appeal, but I did not get any email about its status, perhaps the email provider deleted it as spam but I can not figure it out.

    A suggestion: It would be best if the site could show that a rejected picture is appealed or not and in addition the appeal's status if it is not accepted.

    A request: It is a couple of request here regarding data fixes.
    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ct=#post673849
    Could you fix them?

    Thx in advance!
    Aircaft type is incorrect. You uploaded as SR22, but clearly shows SR22 GTS on tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9017389

    I do not know what was wrong in the data at the upload. Actually I did appeal, but I did not get any email about its status, perhaps the email provider deleted it as spam but I can not figure it out.

    A suggestion: It would be best if the site could show that a rejected picture is appealed or not and in addition the appeal's status if it is not accepted.

    A request: It is a couple of request here regarding data fixes.
    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ct=#post673849
    Could you fix them?

    Thx in advance!





    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about which part of this picture that is wrong regarding colors?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8890480

    Thx in advance.
    Also looks ok to me

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about which part of this picture that is wrong regarding colors?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8890480

    Thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about which part of this picture that is wrong regarding colors?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8763418

    Thx in advance.
    Looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about which part of this picture that is wrong regarding colors?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8763418

    Thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ET-ARD.JPG
Views:	195
Size:	474.9 KB
ID:	1102209

    Hi!

    Could you check this picture. Is it acceptable? I had to use strong noise filter because of the light conditions.

    Thx in advance.
    borderline: slight plastic like look and the typical JPG compression when using too much noise reduction.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ET-ARD.JPG
Views:	195
Size:	474.9 KB
ID:	1102209

    Hi!

    Could you check this picture. Is it acceptable? I had to use strong noise filter because of the light conditions.

    Thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    So you're saying it might have been overprocessed?
    Definitely. I have not checked the grass, because I have been focused fixing its color defects and so on. Using the noise filter is just a piece of cake usually, but It had failed in this case.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X