Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

federbear - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22250[/ATTACH]
    Hi!

    Is this duplicate?

    Thx in advance!
    Compared to which one?

    Cheers

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by meneses24 View Post
      Compared to which one?

      Cheers
      https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8804777

      Landing, departing plane.

      thx in advance.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by federbear View Post
        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8804777

        Landing, departing plane.

        thx in advance.
        Yeah it will be rejected for similar

        Comment


        • #79
          Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	478.1 KB
ID:	1033513

          Hi!

          How does it look like now.

          I think still the reject that I got before can not be JPG compression artefacts.
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7158373

          Thx in advance.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by federbear View Post
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]22487[/ATTACH]

            Hi!

            How does it look like now.

            I think still the reject that I got before can not be JPG compression artefacts.
            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7158373

            Thx in advance.
            Sky is blotchy/compressed. Perhaps you're using some kind of noise reduction?

            Comment


            • #81
              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.7 KB
ID:	1033514

              New version. I tried again the noise reduction combined with a bit less sharpening. It should be better now.

              What do you think?

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by federbear View Post
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]22488[/ATTACH]

                New version. I tried again the noise reduction combined with a bit less sharpening. It should be better now.

                What do you think?
                Better, but still a bit blotchy. Can't say whether it would be bad enough for a rejection (it wouldn't be for me).

                Comment


                • #83
                  It has to be the sensor. There is no tool that can cause such forms in the picture. ISO 200 and the sharpening intensified it. But it is not the JPG artefacts that was in the reject. I try to edit it again from the raw. Perhaps it helps.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	410.1 KB
ID:	1033536

                    This is the reedited picture. I think it is much better now, but of course a new edit can has other problems. What do you think?

                    thx in advance!

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by federbear View Post
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]22516[/ATTACH]

                      This is the reedited picture. I think it is much better now, but of course a new edit can has other problems. What do you think?

                      thx in advance!
                      Would be ok for me.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Hi!

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7174439

                        I have a question regarding this reject. I have already appealed it and the explanation said that the nose should have more light. As you see, the sun was shining from the back of the plane, and the plane's nose is red, which is not a light tone.

                        What about this picture? It was very similar situation, except the color of the nose.
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9120058
                        And this?
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9225293

                        Is it a rule that says that if a plane part has dark tones and without sunlight, then it has to be rejected?

                        Thx in advance!

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          I would disagree somewhat with that rejection; the problem appears more to be the harsh contrast between the darker and lighter areas, rather than just straight underexposure. Try boosting the exposure a touch, but also bring the shadows up a lot more. The lack of light on the nose is a subjective thing, as it's kind of unattractive, but it's not a reason for rejection by itself.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                            I would disagree somewhat with that rejection; the problem appears more to be the harsh contrast between the darker and lighter areas, rather than just straight underexposure. Try boosting the exposure a touch, but also bring the shadows up a lot more. The lack of light on the nose is a subjective thing, as it's kind of unattractive, but it's not a reason for rejection by itself.
                            Thx! I think it looks better with more shadow.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Hi!

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-JOV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.9 KB
ID:	1034304

                              Is the attached picture duplicated with this: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8691541

                              I think it is not, but it does not worth risking a reject.

                              thx in advance!

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by federbear View Post
                                Hi!

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]23487[/ATTACH]

                                Is the attached picture duplicated with this: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8691541

                                I think it is not, but it does not worth risking a reject.

                                thx in advance!
                                Should be different enough to be ok.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X