Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

federbear - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Here is the data from the reject:

    Photo Location
    Oslo-Gardermoen - ENGM
    Norway

    Aircraft
    Reg: VP-BIK full info | VP-BIK photos
    Aircraft: Boeing 747-46NERF
    Airline: Air Bridge Cargo

    From FR24:
    04 Jun 2019 Leipzig (LEJ) Oslo (OSL) RU293 1:29 — 18:34 —
    Landed 21:03

    Should I appeal?
    Please read my comments again. The correct info IS visible on the rejected image page, which means the bad info rejection was likely due to a bug at the time of screening, not because it was incorrect. That can certainly be appealed. The overprocessed part, I will leave that up to you whether it's worth making an appeal.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Here is the data from the reject:

    Photo Location
    Oslo-Gardermoen - ENGM
    Norway

    Aircraft
    Reg: VP-BIK full info | VP-BIK photos
    Aircraft: Boeing 747-46NERF
    Airline: Air Bridge Cargo

    From FR24:
    04 Jun 2019 Leipzig (LEJ) Oslo (OSL) RU293 1:29 — 18:34 —
    Landed 21:03

    Should I appeal?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7355858

    What does over processed mean in this case? I really do not understand it. It is a picture about a late arrival, the sun is almost down. Otherwise it does not have halo or something else.
    Not really sure either. Don't see any editing halos or anything like that.


    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    The other reason: Bad Info. I selected all categories that should regard the picture.
    * night
    * cargo
    * special, because of the extra on this plane. XL and the box logo (XL oversize sticker) on its tale and fuselage as other 39 pictures also have.
    Those are categories, and not related to bad info. It was rejected due to aircraft type and location, though since both of those are visible on the rejected image page, I'm going to assume there was a bug where they didn't show up on the screening page, which sometimes happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    Could you help me regarding this reject?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7355858

    What does over processed mean in this case? I really do not understand it. It is a picture about a late arrival, the sun is almost down. Otherwise it does not have halo or something else.
    The other reason: Bad Info. I selected all categories that should regard the picture.
    * night
    * cargo
    * special, because of the extra on this plane. XL and the box logo (XL oversize sticker) on its tale and fuselage as other 39 pictures also have.

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Still slight blue/cyan cast, but maybe passable. I wouldn't suggest adjusting the color in only one part of the frame, lest you end up with a bad processing rejection.
    Thx for your help!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25361[/ATTACH]

    Hi!

    How does it look like now? I added red to the fuselage, but the sky was terrible so I had to compensate it.

    Thx in advance!
    Still slight blue/cyan cast, but maybe passable. I wouldn't suggest adjusting the color in only one part of the frame, lest you end up with a bad processing rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Strong cyan cast.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TST.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	612.6 KB
ID:	1039990

    Hi!

    How does it look like now? I added red to the fuselage, but the sky was terrible so I had to compensate it.

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7361701

    Could you help me regarding this reject? A bit more info would be great.

    Thx in advance!
    Strong cyan cast.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7361701

    Could you help me regarding this reject? A bit more info would be great.

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25134[/ATTACH]

    Would this picture be rejected as duplicate?

    I have already this approved picture with same reg:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8943647

    Thx in advance!
    Would be ok for me since the backgrounds are quite different, but it will be a subjective decision by whoever screens it.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIUP.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	699.4 KB
ID:	1039782

    Would this picture be rejected as duplicate?

    I have already this approved picture with same reg:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8943647

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7301656

    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about this reject? There was not added any comment in the email about which color that is wrong.

    Thx in advance!
    There is a strong yellow/green tint to the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7301656

    Hi!

    Could you explain a bit more about this reject? There was not added any comment in the email about which color that is wrong.

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24627[/ATTACH]

    Hi!

    Please take a look at this picture. Is it acceptable?

    Thx in advance!
    Also very borderline for contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	LN-BAA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	877.0 KB
ID:	1035262

    Hi!

    Please take a look at this picture. Is it acceptable?

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X