Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

federbear - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • federbear
    replied
    It has to be the sensor. There is no tool that can cause such forms in the picture. ISO 200 and the sharpening intensified it. But it is not the JPG artefacts that was in the reject. I try to edit it again from the raw. Perhaps it helps.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22488[/ATTACH]

    New version. I tried again the noise reduction combined with a bit less sharpening. It should be better now.

    What do you think?
    Better, but still a bit blotchy. Can't say whether it would be bad enough for a rejection (it wouldn't be for me).

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.7 KB
ID:	1033514

    New version. I tried again the noise reduction combined with a bit less sharpening. It should be better now.

    What do you think?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22487[/ATTACH]

    Hi!

    How does it look like now.

    I think still the reject that I got before can not be JPG compression artefacts.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7158373

    Thx in advance.
    Sky is blotchy/compressed. Perhaps you're using some kind of noise reduction?

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	478.1 KB
ID:	1033513

    Hi!

    How does it look like now.

    I think still the reject that I got before can not be JPG compression artefacts.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7158373

    Thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8804777

    Landing, departing plane.

    thx in advance.
    Yeah it will be rejected for similar

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Originally posted by meneses24 View Post
    Compared to which one?

    Cheers
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8804777

    Landing, departing plane.

    thx in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22250[/ATTACH]
    Hi!

    Is this duplicate?

    Thx in advance!
    Compared to which one?

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7138811

    Please explain a bit more regarding this reject.

    Thx in advance!
    Colors look odd, do not over saturate it in order to have the contrast ok

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-PST.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	536.4 KB
ID:	1033305
    Hi!

    Is this duplicate?

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7138811

    Please explain a bit more regarding this reject.

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]22163[/ATTACH]

    Hi!

    I need your opinion. How does it look like? Is the contrast OK?

    Thx in advance!
    Borderline, but would be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-LTG.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.3 KB
ID:	1033236

    Hi!

    I need your opinion. How does it look like? Is the contrast OK?

    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by federbear View Post
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7127697

    Could you explain which color you have found wrong regarding this reject?

    I got comment that I should use sRGB, despite I never used Adobe. Is it a general comment?
    The picture is definitely in sRGB color space:

    identify -verbose EI-ESR.jpg | grep -A1 Profile-icc
    Profile-icc: 3144 bytes
    Description: sRGB IEC61966-2.1


    Thx in advance!
    Mistake by the screener. I've let them know, and accepted the image.

    Leave a comment:


  • federbear
    replied
    Hi!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7127697

    Could you explain which color you have found wrong regarding this reject?

    I got comment that I should use sRGB, despite I never used Adobe. Is it a general comment?
    The picture is definitely in sRGB color space:

    identify -verbose EI-ESR.jpg | grep -A1 Profile-icc
    Profile-icc: 3144 bytes
    Description: sRGB IEC61966-2.1


    Thx in advance!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X