Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29048[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29049[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29050[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29051[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29052[/ATTACH]

    Tks!
    1. blurry, noisy, horizon, overprocessed
    2. contrast, noisy, heat haze
    3. dark/contrast, noisy
    4. contrast, noisy
    5. heat haze, noisy

    None of the images are fixable, please don't submit.

    Comment


    • Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6413 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	476.0 KB
ID:	1043381
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6963 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	708.4 KB
ID:	1043382

      tks!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
        Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29356[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29357[/ATTACH]

        tks!
        They would be rejected, for contrast and soft/blurry/noisy, respectively.

        Comment


        • Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6202 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	699.5 KB
ID:	1043444
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6242 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	637.9 KB
ID:	1043445
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6308 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	755.4 KB
ID:	1043446
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7340 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	526.9 KB
ID:	1043447
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0011 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	584.0 KB
ID:	1043448

          thank you!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
            Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29437[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29438[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29439[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29440[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29441[/ATTACH]

            thank you!
            #3 & 5 would be ok for me; the others have issues with noise/contrast/blurriness.

            Comment


            • Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6607 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	634.5 KB
ID:	1076026Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8524 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	511.8 KB
ID:	1076029Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8564 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	582.2 KB
ID:	1076030
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8212 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	823.3 KB
ID:	1076028Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8164 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	586.0 KB
ID:	1076032
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                Friends screeners, what's your opinion?
                1. ok for me
                2-3 contrast
                4. borderline contrast
                5. heat haze

                Comment


                • Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7209 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	910.0 KB
ID:	1076686
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7288 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	805.3 KB
ID:	1076685
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7766 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	541.3 KB
ID:	1076687
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7900 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	555.9 KB
ID:	1076688
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7907 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	597.9 KB
ID:	1076689

                  thank you!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                    Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7209 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	910.0 KB
ID:	1076686
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7288 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	805.3 KB
ID:	1076685
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7766 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	541.3 KB
ID:	1076687
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7900 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	555.9 KB
ID:	1076688
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7907 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	597.9 KB
ID:	1076689

                    thank you!
                    1. dark/contrast
                    2. dirty
                    3. borderline soft/contrast
                    4. soft, borderline contrast
                    5. borderline contrast

                    Comment


                    • Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7911 ANÁLISE.JPG
Views:	64
Size:	890.5 KB
ID:	1078524
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7970 ANÁLISE.JPG
Views:	59
Size:	505.4 KB
ID:	1078525
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9124 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	799.2 KB
ID:	1078526

                      tks!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                        Friends screeners, what's your opinion?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7911 ANÁLISE.JPG
Views:	64
Size:	890.5 KB
ID:	1078524
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7970 ANÁLISE.JPG
Views:	59
Size:	505.4 KB
ID:	1078525
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9124 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	799.2 KB
ID:	1078526

                        tks!
                        1. borderline noise/contrast/color (cyan tint)
                        2. overexposed, noise
                        3. borderline contrast/noise

                        Comment


                        • Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8385 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	652.6 KB
ID:	1084095
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8663 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	514.2 KB
ID:	1084096
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8513 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	836.8 KB
ID:	1084097
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9619 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	746.3 KB
ID:	1084098
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9633 YU-SCJ ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	655.4 KB
ID:	1084099

                          tks

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                            Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8385 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	652.6 KB
ID:	1084095
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8663 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	514.2 KB
ID:	1084096
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8513 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	836.8 KB
ID:	1084097
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9619 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	746.3 KB
ID:	1084098
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9633 YU-SCJ ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	655.4 KB
ID:	1084099

                            tks
                            1. contrast, noise
                            2. borderline overexposed/vignetting
                            3. backlit
                            4. soft/blurry
                            5. soft/blurry, noise

                            Comment


                            • Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9460 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	805.1 KB
ID:	1085438
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7970 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	512.1 KB
ID:	1085439
                              (New edition)

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8132 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	440.4 KB
ID:	1085440
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8401 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	805.2 KB
ID:	1085441
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8739 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	565.6 KB
ID:	1085442

                              tks!


                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                                Dear, friends! I would like to give opinions about these photos:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9460 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	805.1 KB
ID:	1085438
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7970 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	512.1 KB
ID:	1085439
                                (New edition)

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8132 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	440.4 KB
ID:	1085440
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8401 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	805.2 KB
ID:	1085441
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_8739 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	565.6 KB
ID:	1085442

                                tks!

                                1. soft
                                2. ok
                                3. backlit
                                4. contrast
                                5. blurry/heathazed, oversharpened

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X