Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Originally posted by 777MAN View Post
    Hi
    1. Heat hazed contrast etc.. not fixable.
    2-5. You have uploaded 2 shots of each frame from different sides? Pick one and then happy to comment.

    regards Tony
    Good afternoon!
    Yes, from different sides, not characterizing similar.
    It occurs that my doubt is whether it can be characterized backlit from one side, since the sun is exactly vertically on the plane. Observe the shadow below the aircraft.

    Thank you for your attention!

    Leave a comment:


  • 777MAN
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello friends!

    I would like opinions about these photos. Honestly, I am in doubt about being backlit or other defects, since the sun is pinned upright exactly.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19551[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19552[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19555[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19553[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19554[/ATTACH]

    Thankful!
    Hi
    1. Heat hazed contrast etc.. not fixable.
    2-5. You have uploaded 2 shots of each frame from different sides? Pick one and then happy to comment.

    regards Tony

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello friends!

    I would like opinions about these photos. Honestly, I am in doubt about being backlit or other defects, since the sun is pinned upright exactly.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2253.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	626.5 KB
ID:	1031107
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6982.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	762.1 KB
ID:	1031108
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6986.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	809.2 KB
ID:	1031111
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6991.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	812.1 KB
ID:	1031109
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6996.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	823.9 KB
ID:	1031110

    Thankful!

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! I ask you to evaluate:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17774[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17775[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17776[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17777[/ATTACH]

    thank you!
    Hi Rafael,

    IMHO:

    #1. contrast, soft
    #2. soft
    #3. soft, blurry
    #4. looks good

    Wait more comments from the crew.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello! I ask you to evaluate:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6502.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	539.0 KB
ID:	1029623
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6535.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	686.8 KB
ID:	1029624
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6576.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	480.5 KB
ID:	1029625
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6593.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	597.3 KB
ID:	1029626

    thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Thank you, dlowwa

    I kindly ask you to review the following photos:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17585[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17586[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17587[/ATTACH]
    Hi Rafael,

    IMHO:

    #1. Noise, soft
    #2. Soft
    #3. Soft, Blurry

    Better wait more comments from the crew.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Thank you, dlowwa

    I kindly ask you to review the following photos:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5820.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	897.1 KB
ID:	1029481
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1857.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	375.2 KB
ID:	1029482
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2139.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	409.6 KB
ID:	1029483

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Thank you!

    What do you think of these?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17421[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17422[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17423[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17424[/ATTACH]
    1. soft/blurry, noisy
    2. soft/blurry, contrast
    3-4 soft, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Thank you!

    What do you think of these?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5815.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	819.2 KB
ID:	1029370
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5982.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	498.2 KB
ID:	1029371
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5994.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	849.9 KB
ID:	1029372
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6003.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	560.3 KB
ID:	1029373

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Thanks for the feedback, LX-A343

    What do you think of this?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17381[/ATTACH]
    Soft/heat hazed.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback, LX-A343

    What do you think of this?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5464 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	869.6 KB
ID:	1029334

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! What do you think of these photos?
    They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]
    1: soft, contrast
    2: looks slightly leaning to the right. Maybe check the verticals one last time.
    3: oversharpened and/or heat distortion (fine jagged lines)
    4: OK
    5: OK (don't forget to select Night shot and Small Prop)

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! What do you think of these photos?
    They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]

    Friends, I do not know if my post went unnoticed, but I kindly ask you for an evaluation, however much the photos are not in the standards, knowing where there are imperfections always helps us to improve.

    Thankful!

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello! What do you think of these photos?
    They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1369 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	361.8 KB
ID:	1029059
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1568.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	772.5 KB
ID:	1029060
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1663.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	604.3 KB
ID:	1029061
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1669.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	631.4 KB
ID:	1029063
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1709.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	717.6 KB
ID:	1029062

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Thank you, dlowwa.

    Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16886[/ATTACH]
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)
    Yes, similar to the first one.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X