Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi!

    Please, I would like a pre-screening of the following photos:
    1. borderline backlit
    2. borderline oversharpened
    3. borderline contrast
    4. soft/low dof. not ramp.

    Comment


    • Hi!

      Please, I would like a pre-screening of the following photos:

      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC1776 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	567.3 KB
ID:	1132645
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0464 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	539.9 KB
ID:	1132646
      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC1779 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	691.8 KB
ID:	1132648
      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC1806 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	716.6 KB
ID:	1132649

      Would this be a photo of the airport as a "ramp" or the plane in the foreground?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC1927 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	702.8 KB
ID:	1132647


      tks!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
        Hi!

        Please, I would like a pre-screening of the following photos:

        tks!
        1. borderline contrast
        2. soft, contrast
        3. soft
        4. soft, borderline contrast/horizon (CW)
        5. usually if the aircraft is more than 50% of the frame, not ramp..but this looks just about 50%. I'd go with ramp anyway.

        Comment


        • Hi!

          I had previously received rejection for undersharpen on the following photos. After correcting them with a little sharpening came the oversharpen rejection.

          under / over (contrast also corrected)
          Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_9960 rej. undersharpen e contraste.jpg Views:	0 Size:	618.2 KB ID:	1133167/ Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_9960 rej. oversharpen.jpg Views:	0 Size:	656.1 KB ID:	1133169

          under / over
          Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC1528 rej. undersharpen.jpg Views:	0 Size:	517.5 KB ID:	1133171/ Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC1528 rej. oversharpen.jpg Views:	0 Size:	539.3 KB ID:	1133170


          Honestly, the sharpening was minimal, in specific spots. I believe that a better criterion was needed, more or less, in these two cases. So I ask them, is it worth appealing? Or will I need to edit again trying to find an extremely specific middle ground for the photo to be accepted?


          Taking advantage of this, I kindly ask you to pre-screen this photo:

          Click image for larger version  Name:	_DSC2194 ANÁLISE.jpg Views:	0 Size:	544.3 KB ID:	1133172



          tks!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
            Hi!

            I had previously received rejection for undersharpen on the following photos. After correcting them with a little sharpening came the oversharpen rejection.

            Honestly, the sharpening was minimal, in specific spots. I believe that a better criterion was needed, more or less, in these two cases. So I ask them, is it worth appealing? Or will I need to edit again trying to find an extremely specific middle ground for the photo to be accepted?
            Imho, the earlier versions were better, and the 'corrected' versions rightfully rejected. The first one is maybe worth an appeal, but the second looks like a classic too soft -> oversharpened to compensate.

            Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
            Taking advantage of this, I kindly ask you to pre-screen this photo:
            Poor contrast, and somewhat soft/blurry towards the tail. Don't think this is fixable.

            Comment


            • Hi!

              Please, I would like a pre-screening of the following photos:

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0961 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	380.8 KB
ID:	1133233
              Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC2525 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	645.6 KB
ID:	1133234
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0954 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	542.2 KB
ID:	1133235
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0970 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	509.8 KB
ID:	1133236
              Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC2323 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	637.6 KB
ID:	1133237

              thank you!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                Hi!

                Please, I would like a pre-screening of the following photos:
                There are issues with contrast, sharpening and obstruction. #3 might be fixable.

                Comment


                • Hi!

                  Please request pre-screening of the following photos:

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1005 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	414.0 KB
ID:	1133421
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1002 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	570.3 KB
ID:	1133423

                  Is this crop ok?
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1203 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	385.2 KB
ID:	1133422

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1251 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	471.3 KB
ID:	1133420

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC2806 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	649.5 KB
ID:	1133424

                  tks!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                    Hi!

                    Please request pre-screening of the following photos:
                    Softness and contrast are issues for most of the images. The crop is not ok for the third.

                    Comment


                    • Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:

                      In these cases, can these photos be considered similar? They are on different days and despite being "nocturnal", they are in different light conditions:

                      (similar?: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10528769)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC2862 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	738.1 KB
ID:	1134651

                      (similar?: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10312258)
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3330 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	50
Size:	771.2 KB
ID:	1134650

                      In addition to these other three photos:

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3190 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	62
Size:	625.1 KB
ID:	1134647
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3148 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	59
Size:	530.6 KB
ID:	1134652
                      considered obstruction?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3186 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	61
Size:	732.7 KB
ID:	1134648


                      tks!
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                        Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:

                        In these cases, can these photos be considered similar? They are on different days and despite being "nocturnal", they are in different light conditions:
                        Both subjective decisions, though the first would probably be fine and the second likely a rejection.

                        Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                        In addition to these other three photos:
                        1. borderline contrast/horizon
                        2. blurry/heat hazed. no chance.
                        3. soft, borderline obstruction

                        Comment


                        • Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3354 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	49
Size:	539.5 KB
ID:	1135242
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3403 PR-GYD OK.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	614.2 KB
ID:	1135243
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3472 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	41
Size:	647.7 KB
ID:	1135245
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3464 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	51
Size:	688.9 KB
ID:	1135246
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3591OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	45
Size:	630.0 KB
ID:	1135244

                          TKS!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                            Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:
                            1,3. contrast, soft
                            2. borderline obstruction
                            4. contrast, borderline obstruction
                            5. soft

                            Comment


                            • Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3683 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	43
Size:	538.3 KB
ID:	1136159
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC3599 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	630.5 KB
ID:	1136160

                              Thank you!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                                Hi! Please pre-screen these photos:
                                1. obstruction, soft, borderline contrast
                                2. obstruction, contrast

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X