Hello! What do you think of these photos?
They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rafael Freitas - Editing advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View PostThank you, dlowwa.
Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16886[/ATTACH]
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)
Leave a comment:
-
Thank you, dlowwa.
Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Rafael,
1. Noisy fuselage and background
2. Noisy fuselage
3. Very heat hazed
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View PostAbout the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)
As a rule of thumb: if the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View PostThanks guys!
About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16718[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16719[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16720[/ATTACH]
All of them are backlit and also soft IMHO.
Cheers,
Vinicius
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View PostPlease let me know what you think about this photo:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16712[/ATTACH]
I`m not from the crew, but IMHO you need to adjust the dark tones from the photo (just adjust the levels, left side) and also the photo appear to have some compression.
Better wait some comments from the crew too.
Cheers,
Vinicius
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: