Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thanks guys!

    About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5369.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	688.1 KB
ID:	1028777
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5387 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	440.9 KB
ID:	1028778
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5403 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	466.9 KB
ID:	1028779

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
      Thanks guys!

      About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16718[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16719[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]16720[/ATTACH]
      Rafael,

      All of them are backlit and also soft IMHO.

      Cheers,

      Vinicius

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
        About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)
        From the upload guidelines:
        As a rule of thumb: if the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.
        This is the case with the 3 photos you have attached.

        Comment


        • #19
          Thanks for the opinions!

          What do you think of these photos?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5201 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	807.8 KB
ID:	1028802
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5229 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	821.2 KB
ID:	1028803
          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5417 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1028804

          Thankful!

          Comment


          • #20
            Hi Rafael,

            1. Noisy fuselage and background
            2. Noisy fuselage
            3. Very heat hazed
            My profile: https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/110302

            Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/people/[email protected]/
            Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bigev21/

            Comment


            • #21
              Thank you!

              I kindly request an evaluation of these:
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5016.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1,003.7 KB
ID:	1028836
              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5587.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	998.6 KB
ID:	1028837

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                Thank you!

                I kindly request an evaluation of these:
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16782[/ATTACH]
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]16783[/ATTACH]
                1. soft/heat hazed
                2. borderline for glare/reflection

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thank you!

                  What do you think of these?
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0715.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	651.1 KB
ID:	1028873
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0779.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	627.3 KB
ID:	1028874

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                    Thank you!

                    What do you think of these?
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16829[/ATTACH]
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16830[/ATTACH]
                    1. borderline overexposed/color, soft
                    2. overexposed, contrast, soft

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Thank you, dlowwa.

                      Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4870.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	782.9 KB
ID:	1028926
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                        Thank you, dlowwa.

                        Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]16886[/ATTACH]
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)
                        Yes, similar to the first one.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Hello! What do you think of these photos?
                          They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1369 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	361.8 KB
ID:	1029059
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1568.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	772.5 KB
ID:	1029060
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1663.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	604.3 KB
ID:	1029061
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1669.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	631.4 KB
ID:	1029063
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1709.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	717.6 KB
ID:	1029062

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                            Hello! What do you think of these photos?
                            They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]

                            Friends, I do not know if my post went unnoticed, but I kindly ask you for an evaluation, however much the photos are not in the standards, knowing where there are imperfections always helps us to improve.

                            Thankful!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
                              Hello! What do you think of these photos?
                              They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]
                              1: soft, contrast
                              2: looks slightly leaning to the right. Maybe check the verticals one last time.
                              3: oversharpened and/or heat distortion (fine jagged lines)
                              4: OK
                              5: OK (don't forget to select Night shot and Small Prop)
                              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Thanks for the feedback, LX-A343

                                What do you think of this?
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5464 OK.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	869.6 KB
ID:	1029334

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X