Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    1-2. soft, contrast. not fixable
    3. heat haze. not fixable.
    4-5. contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0932 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	70
Size:	311.3 KB
ID:	1117888
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0811 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	60
Size:	616.7 KB
ID:	1117889
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0916 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	58
Size:	617.2 KB
ID:	1117890
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0816 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	62
Size:	700.6 KB
ID:	1117891
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0865 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	63
Size:	790.1 KB
ID:	1117892

    TKS!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    1. compression, borderline contrast
    2. ok for me
    3. soft/blurry
    4. soft, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied

    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0054 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	73
Size:	351.3 KB
ID:	1117360
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7510 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	442.8 KB
ID:	1117361
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0696 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	73
Size:	588.3 KB
ID:	1117362
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0789 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	67
Size:	597.8 KB
ID:	1117363

    tks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Helo! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    1-2. soft, contrast, noise
    3. soft, contrast

    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Can these be considered similar to each other or can it be a bad motive? (Economy x business class of the same aircraft)
    Not similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Helo! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0223 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	382.5 KB
ID:	1116653
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0243 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	452.9 KB
ID:	1116654
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0598 OK.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	554.5 KB
ID:	1116655

    Can these be considered similar to each other or can it be a bad motive? (Economy x business class of the same aircraft)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0655 OK.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	714.7 KB
ID:	1116656Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0656 OK.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	720.4 KB
ID:	1116657

    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello friends, how are you? I begin by asking you about an old question about whether the following photos are similar or not (one in a taxi and the other taking off, but on the same side).

    And I ask you to screen for the following photos:
    1-2. not similar
    3. soft/blurry, contrast
    4. soft, vignetting
    5. contrast, borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied

    Hello friends, how are you? I begin by asking you about an old question about whether the following photos are similar or not (one in a taxi and the other taking off, but on the same side).
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0139 OK.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	588.4 KB
ID:	1116358Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0175 OK1.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	528.0 KB
ID:	1116359


    And I ask you to screen for the following photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6274 OK1.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	418.4 KB
ID:	1116360
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0367.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	479.3 KB
ID:	1116361
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9548 ANÁLISE.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	627.9 KB
ID:	1116362

    thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Helo! Dana, on this photo, was rejected because of the cut. I took care to take into account only the aircraft's cigar, since the vertical stabilizer would not be able to remain whole due to the leveling of the photo. Claiming this in the appeal is there any chance or should I forget?
    Crop on the right side is awkward. I'd try to include the whole stabilizer if possible.


    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    I take this opportunity and ask you if these photos can be considered similar or is it preferable to exchange the second for one that shows the left side of the plane completely?
    Same day? Yes similar. If separated by months/years, then probably ok, not similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied

    Helo! Dana, on this photo, was rejected because of the cut. I took care to take into account only the aircraft's cigar, since the vertical stabilizer would not be able to remain whole due to the leveling of the photo. Claiming this in the appeal is there any chance or should I forget?


    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9700.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	733.6 KB
ID:	1115728


    I take this opportunity and ask you if these photos can be considered similar or is it preferable to exchange the second for one that shows the left side of the plane completely?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9954 OK1.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	577.1 KB
ID:	1115729
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9982 OK1.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	563.1 KB
ID:	1115730

    tks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Helo! I kindly ask for your opinion regarding these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC6260.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	559.0 KB
ID:	1114727
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9700 OK1.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	733.6 KB
ID:	1114728
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9705 OK1.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	808.6 KB
ID:	1114729

    tks
    1. cropping/ratio, soft, noisy
    2-3. borderline contrast/exposure

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied

    Helo! I kindly ask for your opinion regarding these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC6260.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	559.0 KB
ID:	1114727
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9700 OK1.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	733.6 KB
ID:	1114728
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9705 OK1.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	808.6 KB
ID:	1114729

    tks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi friends, how are you?

    Yesterday I had this photo rejected by "bad info: aircraft, location": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9064896. I imagined it was an error, I appealed and the appeal was refused, the screener said that there really was a bug regarding bad info, but that the photo was also dark, justifying the rejection. So far, ok.

    But today I had this photo rejected for the same reason "bad info: aircraft, location", but the data is correct: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9066020. Before appealing, I ask you if this was a bug again and why this is happening. I wonder if there are any more problems in the photo that have not been mentioned in the reasons for the rejection.

    Grateful for the attention

    Rafael Freitas
    Contrast is a bit harsh, but would be ok for me. However, info also appears to be wrong on the rejected image.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi friends, how are you?

    Yesterday I had this photo rejected by "bad info: aircraft, location": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9064896. I imagined it was an error, I appealed and the appeal was refused, the screener said that there really was a bug regarding bad info, but that the photo was also dark, justifying the rejection. So far, ok.

    But today I had this photo rejected for the same reason "bad info: aircraft, location", but the data is correct: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9066020. Before appealing, I ask you if this was a bug again and why this is happening. I wonder if there are any more problems in the photo that have not been mentioned in the reasons for the rejection.

    Grateful for the attention

    Rafael Freitas

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Helo! I kindly ask for your opinion regarding these photos:

    Was it bad motive?
    Would be for me.

    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Disregarding any defects, I have doubts about the location. Could it be the name of the airport itself or the "name of the city - other location" or even "country - in flight"?
    Country - In flight.

    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Finally, correcting any defects, both are considered nocturnal, would it be the case that they are similar even in different light conditions?
    Depends how much time between the images. If they were taken a few years apart, then we might be more lenient for similar. If taken only days, or the same day, then yes similar.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X