Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

[rafaelfreitas]

Thanks guys!

About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)

[vcruvinel]

Thanks guys!

About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16718[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16719[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16720[/ATTACH]

Rafael,

All of them are backlit and also soft IMHO.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[jvdl]

About the photos below, is considered backlit? (the sun is right across the planes)

From the upload guidelines:

As a rule of thumb: if the tail casts a shadow on the fuselage, the photo is most likely to be rejected for backlit.

This is the case with the 3 photos you have attached.

[rafaelfreitas]

Thanks for the opinions!

What do you think of these photos?





Thankful!

[Runway28L]

Hi Rafael,

1. Noisy fuselage and background
2. Noisy fuselage
3. Very heat hazed

[rafaelfreitas]

Thank you!

I kindly request an evaluation of these:

[dlowwa]

Thank you!

I kindly request an evaluation of these:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16782[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16783[/ATTACH]

1. soft/heat hazed
2. borderline for glare/reflection

[rafaelfreitas]

Thank you!

What do you think of these?

[dlowwa]

Thank you!

What do you think of these?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16829[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16830[/ATTACH]

1. borderline overexposed/color, soft
2. overexposed, contrast, soft

[rafaelfreitas]

Thank you, dlowwa.

Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)

[dlowwa]

Thank you, dlowwa.

Do you think this photo can be rejected by similarity on account of these?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16886[/ATTACH]
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8980720 (inside the hangar)
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8507766 (a year before)

Yes, similar to the first one.

[rafaelfreitas]

Hello! What do you think of these photos?
They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

[rafaelfreitas]

Hello! What do you think of these photos?
They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]

Friends, I do not know if my post went unnoticed, but I kindly ask you for an evaluation, however much the photos are not in the standards, knowing where there are imperfections always helps us to improve.

Thankful!

[LX-A343]

Hello! What do you think of these photos?
They are a little old, when I did not like it so much in the edition.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17046[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17047[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17048[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17050[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17049[/ATTACH]

1: soft, contrast
2: looks slightly leaning to the right. Maybe check the verticals one last time.
3: oversharpened and/or heat distortion (fine jagged lines)
4: OK
5: OK (don't forget to select Night shot and Small Prop)

[rafaelfreitas]

Thanks for the feedback, LX-A343

What do you think of this?