Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

[dlowwa]

Helo! As for the A321 cabin photos:

I had asked if these photos were considered similar as I was in doubt whether business class and economy class photos of the same aircraft could be accepted together.

Well, I sent a photo of each class, but I changed the photo of the executive, changing the overview from back to front for a focus on a row of seats, showing even more difference between both photos.

However, I had the photo of the economy class rejected, including in the appeal:

So I will never be able to publish photos of two different classes of the same plane?

tks

Unfortunately you have already appealed, so there is not much I can do to help you. In the future, please ask for help with a rejection before appealing, as we request here:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

[rafaelfreitas]

Helo! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:





Can these be considered similar to each other or can it be a bad motive? (Economy x business class of the same aircraft)



Thank you!

Helo! As for the A321 cabin photos:

I had asked if these photos were considered similar as I was in doubt whether business class and economy class photos of the same aircraft could be accepted together.

Well, I sent a photo of each class, but I changed the photo of the executive, changing the overview from back to front for a focus on a row of seats, showing even more difference between both photos.

However, I had the photo of the economy class rejected, including in the appeal:

So I will never be able to publish photos of two different classes of the same plane?

tks

[dlowwa]

Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

1-2. soft, contrast. not fixable
3. heat haze. not fixable.
4-5. contrast

[rafaelfreitas]

Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:







TKS!

[dlowwa]

Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

1. compression, borderline contrast
2. ok for me
3. soft/blurry
4. soft, contrast

[rafaelfreitas]

Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:






tks!

[dlowwa]

Helo! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

1-2. soft, contrast, noise
3. soft, contrast

Can these be considered similar to each other or can it be a bad motive? (Economy x business class of the same aircraft)

Not similar.

[rafaelfreitas]

Helo! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:





Can these be considered similar to each other or can it be a bad motive? (Economy x business class of the same aircraft)



Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Hello friends, how are you? I begin by asking you about an old question about whether the following photos are similar or not (one in a taxi and the other taking off, but on the same side).

And I ask you to screen for the following photos:

1-2. not similar
3. soft/blurry, contrast
4. soft, vignetting
5. contrast, borderline soft

[rafaelfreitas]

Hello friends, how are you? I begin by asking you about an old question about whether the following photos are similar or not (one in a taxi and the other taking off, but on the same side).



And I ask you to screen for the following photos:





thank you!

[dlowwa]

Helo! Dana, on this photo, was rejected because of the cut. I took care to take into account only the aircraft's cigar, since the vertical stabilizer would not be able to remain whole due to the leveling of the photo. Claiming this in the appeal is there any chance or should I forget?

Crop on the right side is awkward. I'd try to include the whole stabilizer if possible.

I take this opportunity and ask you if these photos can be considered similar or is it preferable to exchange the second for one that shows the left side of the plane completely?

Same day? Yes similar. If separated by months/years, then probably ok, not similar.

[rafaelfreitas]

Helo! Dana, on this photo, was rejected because of the cut. I took care to take into account only the aircraft's cigar, since the vertical stabilizer would not be able to remain whole due to the leveling of the photo. Claiming this in the appeal is there any chance or should I forget?





I take this opportunity and ask you if these photos can be considered similar or is it preferable to exchange the second for one that shows the left side of the plane completely?




tks!

[dlowwa]

Helo! I kindly ask for your opinion regarding these photos:





tks

1. cropping/ratio, soft, noisy
2-3. borderline contrast/exposure

[rafaelfreitas]

Helo! I kindly ask for your opinion regarding these photos:





tks

[dlowwa]

Hi friends, how are you?

Yesterday I had this photo rejected by "bad info: aircraft, location": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9064896. I imagined it was an error, I appealed and the appeal was refused, the screener said that there really was a bug regarding bad info, but that the photo was also dark, justifying the rejection. So far, ok.

But today I had this photo rejected for the same reason "bad info: aircraft, location", but the data is correct: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9066020. Before appealing, I ask you if this was a bug again and why this is happening. I wonder if there are any more problems in the photo that have not been mentioned in the reasons for the rejection.

Grateful for the attention

Rafael Freitas

Contrast is a bit harsh, but would be ok for me. However, info also appears to be wrong on the rejected image.