Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rafael Freitas - Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi!

    In the screener's opinion, are these photos acceptable?
    First would be ok for me, second however is blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi!

    In the screener's opinion, are these photos acceptable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9025 OK.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	660.5 KB
ID:	1128075

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_9086 OK2.JPG
Views:	16
Size:	826.0 KB
ID:	1128076

    tks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    Poor contrast and sharpening issues on all of those, sorry.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3786 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	46
Size:	359.1 KB
ID:	1125200
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3803 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	36
Size:	457.0 KB
ID:	1125201
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3818 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	34
Size:	470.8 KB
ID:	1125202
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3839 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	36
Size:	442.1 KB
ID:	1125203

    TKS!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    1. blurry, overexposed, glare
    2-5. soft/blurry, contrast

    None of these are fixable, please do not upload.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3643 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	56
Size:	559.6 KB
ID:	1124488
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3570 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	639.9 KB
ID:	1124489
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3578 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	50
Size:	696.9 KB
ID:	1124490
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3588 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	706.8 KB
ID:	1124491
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3600 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	46
Size:	741.8 KB
ID:	1124492

    TKS!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:
    Would both be rejected for soft/blurry and contrast. They do not look fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3352 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	75
Size:	646.6 KB
ID:	1123678
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3308 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	64
Size:	775.7 KB
ID:	1123679

    tks

    Leave a comment:


  • Calvin L
    replied
    [QUOTE=rafaelfreitas;n1121575]Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Hello there, I'm not a screener but I see no one assist, so,

    For pic 1, there will be blurry, under sharpened reason for sure, (I know its hard to take an heli picture high up)
    For pic 3, yes it is 100% a rejection due to grass obstacle, because the grass is blocking the engine instead of the landing gear, (grass ONLY covers the landing gear is acceptable) and there is contrast issue also
    For pic 5, I don't think the man is an obstacle, he was behind the helicopter body (the heli body is visible)

    That is what I can advice and help, Welcome

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hi! I kindly ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2668 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	96
Size:	338.0 KB
ID:	1121576

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2530 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	81
Size:	581.5 KB
ID:	1121577

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2677 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	81
Size:	560.3 KB
ID:	1121578
    As for the piece of plant in the engine, can there be rejection due to obstruction? And can the contrast be bad?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2273 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	83
Size:	761.8 KB
ID:	1121579
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2734 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	79
Size:	876.7 KB
ID:	1121580
    Can the man beside the helicopter characterize an obstruction or a bad motive?


    tks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    TKS!
    Soft/blurry and poor contrast on all of these. Please do not upload.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1915 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	33
Size:	268.7 KB
ID:	1119722
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1904 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	30
Size:	319.6 KB
ID:	1119723
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1938 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	30
Size:	461.2 KB
ID:	1119724
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2164 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	30
Size:	414.4 KB
ID:	1119725
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2176 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	32
Size:	456.5 KB
ID:	1119726

    TKS!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by rafaelfreitas View Post
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1022 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	496.9 KB
ID:	1118709Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0632 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	40
Size:	506.5 KB
ID:	1118710Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1110 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	40
Size:	721.1 KB
ID:	1118711

    tks!
    1, 3 contrast. not fixable.
    2 soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Hello! Please, I ask you to pre-screen these photos:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1022 OK (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	47
Size:	496.9 KB
ID:	1118709Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0632 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	40
Size:	506.5 KB
ID:	1118710Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1110 OK1 (ANÁLISE).jpg
Views:	40
Size:	721.1 KB
ID:	1118711

    tks!

    Leave a comment:


  • rafaelfreitas
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Unfortunately you have already appealed, so there is not much I can do to help you. In the future, please ask for help with a rejection before appealing, as we request here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
    Dana,

    I was so sure that the appeal would be accepted that I immediately decided to appeal, not for nothing in my view and in your view the business class and economy class photos of the same plane would not be similar.

    The photo that was accepted differs even more from the photo I ordered pre-screening.

    I think the criteria could be less subjective and more objective. The appeal's response was extremely empty "I agre with all rejections reasons, please read this: (upload guidelines)".

    The guideline only mentions: "- same registration, similar angle or composition or same background taken on different dates."

    The composition of the image of the business and economy class is totally different.

    I was extremely frustrated and saddened by this rejection. Not for the photo itself, but for the situation. Even more so due to the lack of explanation in the appeal.

    Anyway, we move on

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X