Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice

[mahagonny]

My search for a solution did not give satisfactory results.
If any of you have faced this problem and found a solution, I would be happy if you share it with me and, as we say in Italy to those who help us, "coffee is paid"
P.S. The problem originally existed on the RAW file

[dlowwa]

My search for a solution did not give satisfactory results.
If any of you have faced this problem and found a solution, I would be happy if you share it with me and, as we say in Italy to those who help us, "coffee is paid"
P.S. The problem originally existed on the RAW file

Without knowing the actual cause, I am of course unable to offer a solution. I am willing to look at the RAW file, as I would be very surprised to see such halos there.

[mahagonny]

Hello. if you tell me how I can show you the RAW file I'd be happy to show you

[dlowwa]

Hello. if you tell me how I can show you the RAW file I'd be happy to show you

You can contact me privately and I'll give you my email address, or you can post the file somewhere I can download.

[dlowwa]

You can contact me privately and I'll give you my email address, or you can post the file somewhere I can download.

I've taken a look at the raw files you sent, and can confirm that my suspicions were correct, there are no halos present on the raw files. Compare your original upload (with equalized version to emphasize the halo effect)



With a quick edit I did from the raw file you posted, with all settings to zero.



You can clearly see the difference (lack of halos) on my version, which means they are in fact being introduced by something you are doing in your editing process. Beyond what I've already suggested, I can't tell you what that might be exactly, so you'll need to figure that out on your own.

[mahagonny]

Thanks Dana. "Paid coffee"

[dlowwa]

Thanks Dana. "Paid coffee"

I don't drink coffee, but you're welcome

[mahagonny]

Ok, what do you think now?

[dlowwa]

Ok, what do you think now?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22881[/ATTACH]

Some light vignetting visible, but no halos.

[mahagonny]

and here is the problem. The only correction I left in the RAW camera is, precisely, the correction of the lens. But open in photoshop the halos are reproduced

[dlowwa]

and here is the problem. The only correction I left in the RAW camera is, precisely, the correction of the lens. But open in photoshop the halos are reproduced

Perhaps you misunderstood. There are NO halos in this most recent image.

[mahagonny]

Sorry I expressed myself badly. To correct the vignetting I tried to do the lens correction in the RAW camera, but since the halos reappear, I gave up. In this way I avoided the halos, but not the vignetting that, while trying to correct in photoshop, is not eliminated satisfactorily (at least for me I don't know for JP).
As always excuse my bad English.

[mahagonny]

What do you think about now?

[dlowwa]

What do you think about now?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]22959[/ATTACH]

Would be rejected for soft and (severe) compression.

[mahagonny]

That's enough. I give up.