Originally posted by mahagonny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mahagonny View Postwhat do you think of these?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23228[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23229[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]23230[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by mahagonny View Postit is not accettable, i supposeOriginally posted by dlowwa View PostAs before, moderate vignetting on left side. Quality otherwise is ok.
Vignettes are usually caused by shooting at wide aperture values on telephoto lenses. Great for wildlife, not blue sky aviation.
You need to be f8 and above to avoid these. I’ve had a quick look at the attached images. You are shooting at f6.3 @ 300mm! Sorry asking for trouble in good ( especially bright) light.
Revaluate your approach/technique.
Regards T
Comment
-
Originally posted by 777MAN View PostHi, fairly sure I have mentioned before about your camera settings/ technique?
Vignettes are usually caused by shooting at wide aperture values on telephoto lenses. Great for wildlife, not blue sky aviation.
You need to be f8 and above to avoid these. I’ve had a quick look at the attached images. You are shooting at f6.3 @ 300mm! Sorry asking for trouble in good ( especially bright) light.
Revaluate your approach/technique.
Regards T
Comment
-
Originally posted by mahagonny View Postthe first seems to me the best acceptable
I had made a change and to check if it was ok I have it loaded. I have, however, committed naivety. Instead of putting existing registration data, I put the real ones and being a first registration went immediately to screening. But as luck helps the spotter, this upload was good and the photo was accepted. I thank you anyway and I apologize again, even for my bad English.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View PostThey are too similar. Please, choose the one you want to upload.
I had made a change and to check if it was ok I have it loaded. I have, however, committed naivety. Instead of putting existing registration data, I put the real ones and being a first registration went immediately to screening. But as luck helps the spotter, this upload was good and the photo was accepted. I thank you anyway and I apologize again, even for my bad English.
Comment
-
Hi to all
I am curious to understand what this explanation means for the rejection appealed: lack of direct light on the aircraft.
Having the sun veiled directly behind me I don't understand that. And again, this story of the contrast that little is understood, especially if motivated in this way.
This isi the shoot
Comment
-
Originally posted by mahagonny View PostHi to all
I am curious to understand what this explanation means for the rejection appealed: lack of direct light on the aircraft.
Having the sun veiled directly behind me I don't understand that. And again, this story of the contrast that little is understood, especially if motivated in this way.
This isi the shoot
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7238904#
Comment
-
I understood, even if the subject stands out against a dark background and only partially, indeed for nothing, against the sky. This makes it perfect for me. I know the clear sky rule for having discussed it a lot in the past, but I was convinced that it was true when the plane was in the sky.
Thank you.
Comment
Comment