Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice

[mahagonny]

thank you

[mahagonny]

an advice

[mahagonny]

Please an advice

[dlowwa]

Please an advice
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25266[/ATTACH]

If possible, choose better weather conditions in which to shoot if you plan on uploading your images here.

[mahagonny]

Ty.
Unfortunately it is not my airport and I was there for a spotting session. I will try to select the best material.

[mahagonny]

Hi
what do you think about this?
Is it Airport overview?

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hi
what do you think about this?
Is it Airport overview?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25453[/ATTACH]

No direct light on the terminal, poor overall contrast

Regards
Alex

[mahagonny]

Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
I received a rejection for this

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695

I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference

Moreover for this rejection also there is underexposed

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7333484

[VH-ROB]

Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
I received a rejection for this

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695

I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference

I'm not a screener, but there's definitely too much contrast on that one.

[dlowwa]

Good morning. Far be it from me to want to argue over the decisions of the screener, I ask this question in order to understand and better choose the photos to upload to JP.
I received a rejection for this

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7345695

I took care to compare it with the photos of the same aircraft and, frankly, I don't understand the reason for rejection for too much or too little contrast not seeing any substantial difference

Moreover for this rejection also there is underexposed
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7333484

As with appeals, we ask that you not bring other photographers into the discussion. We are discussing your images, taken at different times, locations, and conditions than others.

The latter there is the key. Your images were obviously taken in very flat light, and you have attempted to boost the contrast to compensate. No surprise then that such rejections would result.

[mahagonny]

thank you

[mahagonny]

Visible editing halos.

Hi guys
Yesterday I received this rejection.
Having used the usual post production settings, I am unable to understand where I went wrong. Thanks to those who want to help me.
P.Š. Another shot of the same plane was accepted.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7377596

Excuse my bad English

[mahagonny]

Hi
is it accetable?

[Majky737]

Hi guys
Yesterday I received this rejection.
Having used the usual post production settings, I am unable to understand where I went wrong. Thanks to those who want to help me.
P.Š. Another shot of the same plane was accepted.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7377596

Excuse my bad English

Hi,

there are some halos around the aircraft - they can be spotted easily after using "Check for dustspot" function. Are these halos on original picture (output from camera) too, or do you see them just after processing?

[mahagonny]

I realized that the RAW also suffers from the problem. So I have to understand what happened having done f10 diaphragm.
Thanks for reply