Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mahagonny
    replied
    Hi
    Do I have to put small prop?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9065.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.21 MB
ID:	1034933

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    The color of the plane makes it look undersharpen. The equalized version does not show this problem.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8840.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	965.4 KB
ID:	1034892

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    I'll do it like this. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Thank you.
    I thought the square format was acceptable.
    I changed to the classic one and centered better.
    What do you think about it now?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23992[/ATTACH]
    Kind of awkward. Why not keep a portrait orientation rather than landscape?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8799.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	727.3 KB
ID:	1034731

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Thank you.
    I thought the square format was acceptable.
    I changed to the classic one and centered better.
    What do you think about it now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8799_a.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	497.0 KB
ID:	1034730

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Hi
    I would like to kown if it's acceptable
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23978[/ATTACH]
    Would be rejected for cropping/ratio, and probably centering as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Hi
    I would like to kown if it's acceptable
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8799.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	799.0 KB
ID:	1034717

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    thank you so much

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    I ask you for an opinion. Thanks.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23764[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23766[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23768[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23769[/ATTACH]
    Borderline contrast on all, but would be acceptable for me, except perhaps the last. Horizon on third also questionable.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    I ask you for an opinion. Thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0035.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	704.8 KB
ID:	1034533

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0047.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	486.5 KB
ID:	1034535

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0052.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	810.8 KB
ID:	1034537

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0056.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	770.3 KB
ID:	1034538

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Hi
    what do you think about this?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23625[/ATTACH]
    Obstructed, backlit, soft, heat hazed.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Hi
    what do you think about this?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9866.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1034415

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    is this a priority? Besides, is it a good shot?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]23555[/ATTACH]
    Why do you think it would qualify as hot? Image is somewhat soft and highlights possibly blown out.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    is this a priority? Besides, is it a good shot?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9768.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	737.7 KB
ID:	1034352

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X