Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Enzo Gattullo Pre Screen/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Please an opinion. Also, do I have to flag small prop?
    Borderline heat hazed. Otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Also, do I have to flag small prop?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2013.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	932.9 KB
ID:	1140187
    The small prop is for aircraft having space for 10 or fewer people on board.
    Sky master has around four seats, so I guess a small prop is definitely applicable.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Please an opinion. Also, do I have to flag small prop?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2013.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	932.9 KB
ID:	1140187

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post

    I thank you even if I have to confess that I am a little confused.
    There are also accepted other photos taken in the same conditions always on the same day and in the same airport.
    I would like to understand how to regulate myself for the future.
    In this case I considered acceptable also because, at least on my monitor and from what little I understand of the histograms, the plane seemed well lit to me.
    Thanks again.
    You asked if it was rejected because of too much or little contrast, I clarified that it was due to the weather. Whether you agree or disagree with that rejection, I will leave with you.

    Images taken in cloudy weather will usually have less chance of being accepted, but not no chance.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. poor contrast due to overcast conditions
    I thank you even if I have to confess that I am a little confused.
    There are also accepted other photos taken in the same conditions always on the same day and in the same airport.
    I would like to understand how to regulate myself for the future.
    In this case I considered acceptable also because, at least on my monitor and from what little I understand of the histograms, the plane seemed well lit to me.
    Thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Happy Sunday
    I received these two rejections and I would like to ask about the first if it is too much or too little contrast and about the second which parts are soft because I can't figure it out from my monitor.
    Thank you
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10218286
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10218883
    1. poor contrast due to overcast conditions
    2. tail is soft

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Happy Sunday
    I received these two rejections and I would like to ask about the first if it is too much or too little contrast and about the second which parts are soft because I can't figure it out from my monitor.
    Thank you
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10218286
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10218883

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    Thanks. I thought it was a highlight out of range

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    I recently received this rejection
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10192314
    Not considering the contrast problem, an overexposure is added which, honestly, I can't interpret from the isogram.
    Could anyone help me?
    Area in red indicates overexposure:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	histogram.png
Views:	84
Size:	13.9 KB
ID:	1138724

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    I recently received this rejection
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10192314
    Not considering the contrast problem, an overexposure is added which, honestly, I can't interpret from the isogram.
    Could anyone help me?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    please an opinion
    Poor contrast. Not fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    please an opinion

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9338.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	641.6 KB
ID:	1137217

    Leave a comment:


  • mahagonny
    replied
    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by mahagonny View Post
    Good Morning
    In all honesty, I struggle to understand where they are soft. Could I get some help? Thanks

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10114943

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10114959
    First one is much worse than the second, as it's nearly blurry. Second would have been ok for me, so perhaps just another slight pass of sharpening is needed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X