Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

comet1 - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by comet1 View Post
    Hi,

    I got this pic https://abload.de/img/q33a5355-1grossfilterzekx9.jpg rejected with over processed/bad postprocessing rejected.

    I'm not sure what the main point is. Noise, compression, lights, contrast, sharpness and so on? In the guidelines I cannot find that point.

    Has anybody an idea ?

    Best greetings

    Rainer
    Looks, as if you used too much noise reducing.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #47
      Thank you. I will try to reedit it. I hope it works. Nicce weekend!

      Comment


      • #48
        Hi,

        would such a shot have a chance to be accepted?

        https://abload.de/img/q33a6046-1grossneufilv8jly.jpg

        Best greetings

        Rainer

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by comet1 View Post
          Hi,

          would such a shot have a chance to be accepted?

          https://abload.de/img/q33a6046-1grossneufilv8jly.jpg

          Best greetings

          Rainer
          Motive is rather borderline. Some screeners might accept it, others not. For me, a real killer is the noise in the shadows. So, my suggestion is, try to increase the quality of the photo and upload it. What can you loose?
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • #50
            Thank you for your quick answer LAX-343. When I upload it, is it a rampshot without reg. given?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by comet1 View Post
              Thank you for your quick answer LAX-343. When I upload it, is it a rampshot without reg. given?
              If you want to upload this, I suggest you upload as airport shot, as explained in the upload page.
              My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

              Comment


              • #52
                Hi,

                one question to understand and NOT to complain:

                This picture was accepted in the db:
                https://abload.de/img/q33a5795-2grossfilterkdkfy.jpg

                And this was rejected for "similar photo uploaded"
                https://abload.de/img/q33a5825-1grossfilter1fkeb.jpg

                After appeal I got the answer
                Admin Comments >> head-on and side-on view from the same day are regarded as similar

                The guideline says:
                Similar refers to:
                - a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off
                or
                - same registration, similar angle or composition or same background taken on different dates.
                - Close up views and full or partial views of an a/c taken at the same angle, are generally considered similar.

                For me that is a different angle and it is not the same sequence. Imo the admins appeal answer doesn't fit to the guideline.

                The rule itself makes sense to me but in this case it is imo handled too strictly.

                What do you think?

                You all have a nice weekend

                Rainer

                Comment


                • #53
                  Hi,

                  is there any teammember who can give an answer to my question from October 30th ?

                  Best greetings

                  Rainer

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X