Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

nik-pilgrim - rejection help/editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I am surprised and do not understand those who decide to approve the picture. Again I tried to present the picture - I received such an answer...
    Reason (s) for failure:
    Backlit
    vignetting is not allowed
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9699044
    Backlighting (if I understand correctly), but here light falls from the nose.
    Vignetting - where did this error come from if this parameter did not touch and in previous photos there was no such error? I have an automatic fix for the vignette as soon as I download the picture to my computer.
    How do I customize my picture? I completely do not understand what parameter and how to fix it.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	63441_1638376776.jpg Views:	0 Size:	489.3 KB ID:	1128231

    Comment


    • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
      I am surprised and do not understand those who decide to approve the picture. Again I tried to present the picture - I received such an answer...
      Reason (s) for failure:
      Backlit
      vignetting is not allowed
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9699044
      Backlighting (if I understand correctly), but here light falls from the nose.
      Vignetting - where did this error come from if this parameter did not touch and in previous photos there was no such error? I have an automatic fix for the vignette as soon as I download the picture to my computer.
      How do I customize my picture? I completely do not understand what parameter and how to fix it.
      Vignetting removal was likely what caused the poor processing rejection previously.

      Again, probably you should read the upload/rejection guide first, and then come back here if you have any specific questions.

      Comment


      • I do not understand the wording from the administration. He filed a job https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9701439
        I was refused with the wording - Backlit. The administrator was so kind that he gave an explanation - Clear backlit, entire fuselage and tail is dark due the position of the sun.
        But on the site I saw enough work in which part of the fuselage was not just dark, but black because of the shadow and lighting, but these work was accepted...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
          I do not understand the wording from the administration. He filed a job https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=9701439
          I was refused with the wording - Backlit. The administrator was so kind that he gave an explanation - Clear backlit, entire fuselage and tail is dark due the position of the sun.
          But on the site I saw enough work in which part of the fuselage was not just dark, but black because of the shadow and lighting, but these work was accepted...
          I'm not a crew.
          This are backlit, the light are at the other side. And unfixable.

          Comment


          • light falls right along the landing course, shines directly into the crew's face, in the picture this is the left side. For example, in this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10389605 the light falls almost identical, but the work is accepted, or in this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10389551 here the light actually actually divides the fuselage into two parts (bright stern and dark bow). You can continue for a long time, there is a lot of such work. Therefore, there is a misunderstanding of the mistake that would prevent such a thing in the future.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by nik-pilgrim View Post
              light falls right along the landing course, shines directly into the crew's face, in the picture this is the left side. For example, in this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10389605 the light falls almost identical, but the work is accepted, or in this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10389551 here the light actually actually divides the fuselage into two parts (bright stern and dark bow). You can continue for a long time, there is a lot of such work. Therefore, there is a misunderstanding of the mistake that would prevent such a thing in the future.
              Found this within another discussion of the DPP forum.

              For reference, JP screeners look at the tail, if it's in its own shadow, then we consider it as backlit”

              as you can see, this applies to your photo.

              Comment


              • I'll try to change the shooting angle... Thank you all for the explanations and answers

                Comment

                Working...
                X