Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Philippe Ch - Editing Advance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by f1hgu View Post
    Hi,

    I got this photo rejected for soft

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Which part of the aircraft is soft?

    Thank's for your help.
    Philippe
    Slightly blurry all over, best visible on the nose, specially the Air France / KLM sticker.
    My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

      Slightly blurry all over, best visible on the nose, specially the Air France / KLM sticker.
      Thank's for your help

      Comment


      • #33
        Hello,

        I try a new scanner, and I would like to know if this 2 slides are acceptable to be uploaded on JP

        Click image for larger version

Name:	CCP 727 N696CA LAS 16002_NO35_1400.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	548.1 KB
ID:	1079948Click image for larger version

Name:	MCC IL7 ER-IBE CGN 080803_NO35_1400.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	547.2 KB
ID:	1079949 Thank's in advance for your comment

        Philippe

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by f1hgu View Post
          Hello,

          I try a new scanner, and I would like to know if this 2 slides are acceptable to be uploaded on JP

          Click image for larger version

Name:	CCP 727 N696CA LAS 16002_NO35_1400.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	548.1 KB
ID:	1079948Click image for larger version

Name:	MCC IL7 ER-IBE CGN 080803_NO35_1400.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	547.2 KB
ID:	1079949 Thank's in advance for your comment

          Philippe
          Both are quite soft, and the second has a strange halo/vignetting effect. Other than that, they should be ok.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Both are quite soft, and the second has a strange halo/vignetting effect. Other than that, they should be ok.
            Thank's for your return.
            Philippe

            Comment


            • #36
              Hello,

              It's been a while since I uploaded new photos to the site, can you prescreen this four photos. Hope I didn't lose my touch.

              Thank you for your return

              Philippe

              Click image for larger version

Name:	EIN 333 EI-DUZ_10 ORY 231121_1600.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	653.1 KB
ID:	1127940Click image for larger version

Name:	FBU 359 F-HREU_11 ORY 231121_1600.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	690.3 KB
ID:	1127941Click image for larger version

Name:	CTM 332 F-UJCT_06 ORY 231120.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	863.6 KB
ID:	1127942Click image for larger version

Name:	RAM 738 CN-RGV_10 ORY 231121_1600.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	891.3 KB
ID:	1127943

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by f1hgu View Post
                Hello,

                It's been a while since I uploaded new photos to the site, can you prescreen this four photos. Hope I didn't lose my touch.
                Images are soft/heat hazed and lack the quality for 1600pix.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Images are soft/heat hazed and lack the quality for 1600pix.
                  Thank's

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Hello,

                    This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9720692 was rejected for JPG compression artefacts.

                    Which element or part of the image indicates that there is a compression problem?
                    I did not crop the photo too much.

                    Thank's in advance for your help
                    Philippe

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by f1hgu View Post
                      Hello,

                      This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9720692 was rejected for JPG compression artefacts.

                      Which element or part of the image indicates that there is a compression problem?
                      I did not crop the photo too much.

                      Thank's in advance for your help
                      Philippe
                      There is a bit of blotchiness/banding in the sky, but actually not too bad for me.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        There is a bit of blotchiness/banding in the sky, but actually not too bad for me.
                        So You think I can reasonably appeal this photo?

                        This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9723695 also rejected for the same raison.
                        I don't understand

                        Thank's for your reply
                        Philippe

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by f1hgu View Post

                          So You think I can reasonably appeal this photo?

                          This photo https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9723695 also rejected for the same raison.
                          I don't understand

                          Thank's for your reply
                          Philippe
                          Mmmm.. it's a bit more noticeable in the second one. You could appeal, but my opinion is just my own, I wouldn't be certain the appeal would be successful.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            Mmmm.. it's a bit more noticeable in the second one. You could appeal, but my opinion is just my own, I wouldn't be certain the appeal would be successful.
                            Il will try to appeal the photos
                            Thank's for your reply

                            Philippe

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X