Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wheat - rejection and editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26043[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26044[/ATTACH]

    Are these better?
    No, would be rejected for same reasons as mentioned previously, although #5 should have read 'soft, *contrast, cropping/ratio'

    You should at least read the basics for image requirements here to get the ratio correct, but the poor light/contrast makes it not really worth putting too much more effort into these images.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9963-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	288.8 KB
ID:	1040569Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0076-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	293.2 KB
ID:	1040570

    Are these better?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26037[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26038[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26039[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26040[/ATTACH]

    pre screening for these please and thank you
    1. contrast, soft, cropping/ratio
    2. contrast, soft, horizon
    3. contrast, soft, cropping/ratio
    4. contrast, soft
    5. soft, horizon, cropping/ratio

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0016.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	307.8 KB
ID:	1040564Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0042-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	304.4 KB
ID:	1040565Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0076-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	299.1 KB
ID:	1040566Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9963-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	285.0 KB
ID:	1040567

    pre screening for these please and thank you
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    Any tips on how to get rid of halos
    You can't, really. You can only avoid them in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1. overprocessed (editing halos), borderline contrast
    2. soft
    3. cut off, soft, centering
    4. overprocessed, cut off, color
    5. manipulation, soft/blurry

    Last one would likely get a warning put on your account. I wouldn't be submitting that one if I were you.
    Any tips on how to get rid of halos

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26000[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26001[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26002[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26004


    Pre screening for these please and thank you Dlowwa for pre screening my photos last time.

    (Ignore them being attached thumbnail I messed up while doing something)
    1. overprocessed (editing halos), borderline contrast
    2. soft
    3. cut off, soft, centering
    4. overprocessed, cut off, color
    5. manipulation, soft/blurry

    Last one would likely get a warning put on your account. I wouldn't be submitting that one if I were you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6127.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	260.9 KB
ID:	1040532Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6416.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	300.5 KB
ID:	1040533Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6530.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	596.8 KB
ID:	1040534[ATTACH=CONFIG]26004


    Pre screening for these please and thank you Dlowwa for pre screening my photos last time.

    (Ignore them being attached thumbnail I messed up while doing something)
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25733[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25734[/ATTACH]

    Is this better?
    1. acceptable for me
    2. don't think this one is fixable

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9555-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	516.9 KB
ID:	1040298Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9802-4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	467.9 KB
ID:	1040299

    Is this better?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25714[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25715[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25716[/ATTACH]

    pre screening for these please thanks!
    1. borderline contrast
    2. contrast
    3. ok
    4. exposure/contrast
    5. ok

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9555-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.9 KB
ID:	1040277Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9802-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	441.5 KB
ID:	1040278Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9325-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	286.6 KB
ID:	1040279Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9083-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.1 KB
ID:	1040280Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9350.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	347.0 KB
ID:	1040281

    pre screening for these please thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Wheat View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25547[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25548[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25549[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25550[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]25551[/ATTACH]

    I'm back and I have 9 photos uploaded. Anyway can someone please pre screen these?
    1: does not meet size ratio requirements
    2-4: soft, lack of contrast
    5: lacks a lot of contrast, mainly mid tones and shadows

    Leave a comment:


  • Wheat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9352.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	362.7 KB
ID:	1040140Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9338-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	325.7 KB
ID:	1040141Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9325-5.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	283.5 KB
ID:	1040142Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9159-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	294.0 KB
ID:	1040143Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9083-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	542.8 KB
ID:	1040144

    I'm back and I have 9 photos uploaded. Anyway can someone please pre screen these?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Just a small piece of advice for the future: as it says here, it might be a good idea to ask for advice on rejected images before appealing. Appealing an image directly that you've already been told is probably too soft and expecting a different outcome is a waste of time for both you and those the giving advice. I don't see myself taking the time to answer your questions/requests if that continues.

    The BA is still soft toward the edges.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X