Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

cwk6888 - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8406618

    Somewhat mystified by the rejection reason. It was shot using ISO 100, so noise should not be a problem. Wonder where it is grainy. Thanks.
    Maybe oversharpened was meant to have been selected instead. I don't see much noise either.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8406618

    Somewhat mystified by the rejection reason. It was shot using ISO 100, so noise should not be a problem. Wonder where it is grainy. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8126636

    Please let me know what the problem is with the rejected image above. Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    Would appreciate feedback of my message posted couple days ago. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    The image below is rejected:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8089800

    It was taken just prior to sunset, and "Night shot" is selected. The histogram does not overlap the right hand side. Not sure why it is considered to be overexposed. Thank you in advance for any advice.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post

    The screener indicates CCW rotation required. What reference should I use as there is no obvious vertical element?
    There is a large hangar in the background. It is leaning to the right. What is visible of the horizon itself is also dropping to the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    The image below is rejected as unlevel horizon:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8092349#

    The screener indicates CCW rotation required. What reference should I use as there is no obvious vertical element? Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8045986

    The above photo is rejected for not being centered. I have a hard time determining it. Please advise whether it is too high or too low.
    On the rejected image page at the bottom, there are a series of links known as 'screening tools', including Check For Dust, Histogram, etc..

    If you click on the one called 'Center' you can open a view of the image with a centering grid applied. You can then see how your image is centered.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	procimages.jpeg
Views:	86
Size:	459.4 KB
ID:	1086833

    Having done so, you can clearly see the aircraft is too high in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8045986

    The above photo is rejected for not being centered. I have a hard time determining it. Please advise whether it is too high or too low.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post

    Thanks. What are the other issues?
    Aircraft is soft/blurry in parts.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A touch high, but centering should be acceptable. Other issues though.
    Thanks. What are the other issues?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post
    Due to the angle of the image, I am having difficulty determining whether the plane is properly centered in the frame or not. Any advice is appreciated.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_2288.jpg Views:	0 Size:	772.4 KB ID:	1086622
    A touch high, but centering should be acceptable. Other issues though.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    Due to the angle of the image, I am having difficulty determining whether the plane is properly centered in the frame or not. Any advice is appreciated.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2288.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	772.4 KB
ID:	1086622

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by cwk6888 View Post
    Is the presence of "787" considered to be special livery?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • cwk6888
    replied
    Is the presence of "787" considered to be special livery? It is on all EVA B789. Thanks.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0879.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	791.8 KB
ID:	1084247

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X