Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ellx - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Ellx View Post
    Hi, thanks for advice CQ.

    Please prescreen the following photo:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16190[/ATTACH]

    thank you.
    Would be rejected for soft, and overprocessed for the same halo effect mentioned above.

    Comment


    • #47
      Hi, does JP accept this kind of picture?
      Thank you
      Click image for larger version

Name:	Frecce-Tricolori.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	536.3 KB
ID:	1029896

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Ellx View Post
        Hi, does JP accept this kind of picture?
        Thank you
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]18092[/ATTACH]
        Yes.

        Comment


        • #49
          Hi,
          Got this photo rejected for contrast and Categorie.
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6771721
          I reworked the photo could you please prescreen it.
          And just let me know what I did wrong with Categorie.
          Thank you.
          Click image for larger version

Name:	J-879_F-16_Netherlands-Air-Force.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.29 MB
ID:	1030154

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Ellx View Post
            Hi,
            Got this photo rejected for contrast and Categorie.
            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6771721
            I reworked the photo could you please prescreen it.
            And just let me know what I did wrong with Categorie.
            Thank you.
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]18429[/ATTACH]
            Don't see a big difference between the two, but the original wasn't that bad, imho. Missing Special Scheme category.

            Comment


            • #51
              Hi,
              This photo is a reject for soft and bad info:
              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6885600
              could you please prescreen the reworked photo, and let me know what causes the Genre bad info.
              Scramble web says a AT-802AF in the Military database of Macedonia, is that the reason for bad info?
              Thank you.
              Click image for larger version

Name:	Z3-BGU_Airtraktor_Mazedonia-GOV..jpg
Views:	1
Size:	985.6 KB
ID:	1031059
              Please also prescreen this photo:
              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MZJ_ATR_Air-Europe.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	721.6 KB
ID:	1031060
              Last edited by Ellx; 2018-10-27, 22:31. Reason: correcting

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                Hi,
                This photo is a reject for soft and bad info:
                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6885600
                could you please prescreen the reworked photo, and let me know what causes the Genre bad info.
                Scramble web says a AT-802AF in the Military database of Macedonia, is that the reason for bad info?
                Thank you.
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]19500[/ATTACH]
                Looks blurry, and oversharpened to compensate. This is not classified as a military aircraft on JP.


                Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                Please also prescreen this photo:
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]19501[/ATTACH]
                Would be rejected for soft and dark.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Hi, thanks for previous prescreening.
                  Please check the following photos,
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIRP_A321_Lufthansa.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	842.0 KB
ID:	1031072Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZIH_A320_Easyjet.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.07 MB
ID:	1031073Click image for larger version

Name:	VP-BLH_A320_Aeroflot.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	859.4 KB
ID:	1031074

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                    Hi, thanks for previous prescreening.
                    Please check the following photos,
                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]19516[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]19517[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]19518[/ATTACH]
                    Moien!

                    #1 OK
                    #2 bad cropping, backlit, probably oversharpened
                    #3 OK

                    Have a nice evening.
                    Best Regards from Germany,
                    Julian S.​

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Hi, Merci Julien for prescreening.
                      Please prescreen the following photos,thank you.
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-KRP_B747_Pronair.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1031104

                      reworked Easyjet
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EZIH_A320_Easyjet_E1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.00 MB
ID:	1031105

                      reworked Air Europe ATR Nightshot
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MZJ_ATR_Air-Europe_E1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	935.0 KB
ID:	1031106

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                        Hi, Merci Julien for prescreening.
                        Please prescreen the following photos,thank you.
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]19548[/ATTACH]

                        reworked Easyjet
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]19549[/ATTACH]

                        reworked Air Europe ATR Nightshot
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]19550[/ATTACH]
                        #1 dirty, contrast, dark
                        #2 sharpness and crop much better, but to be honest, as in the prescreening above, not fixable due to the backlit
                        #3 contrast
                        Best Regards from Germany,
                        Julian S.​

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          thank you for prescreening,
                          I reworked the B747 and ATR about dirty do you mean the spot on the tarmac?
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-KRP_B747_Pronair_E1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1031112Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MZJ_ATR_Air-Europe_E2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	962.4 KB
ID:	1031113
                          thank you.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                            thank you for prescreening,
                            I reworked the B747 and ATR about dirty do you mean the spot on the tarmac?
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]19556[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]19557[/ATTACH]
                            thank you.
                            Indeed, the spot on the tarmac
                            B747 would be OK for me now (may others disagree)
                            ATR have still not enough contrast for me, not sure if it fixable at all due to the tricky light conditions
                            Best Regards from Germany,
                            Julian S.​

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              ok thank you for prescreening
                              please prescreen the next potos:
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-MDB_C172_Panamedia.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	597.6 KB
ID:	1031127 this aircraft has another paintsheme as the photo that is already in database, is this hot?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-JTQ_A320_Vueling.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	474.0 KB
ID:	1031128Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-HZN_B37_Transavia.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	496.7 KB
ID:	1031129

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Ellx View Post
                                ok thank you for prescreening
                                please prescreen the next potos:
                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]19580[/ATTACH] this aircraft has another paintsheme as the photo that is already in database, is this hot?

                                [ATTACH=CONFIG]19581[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]19582[/ATTACH]
                                #1 OK, and yes for hot (livery change)
                                #2 borderline for contrast
                                #3 horizon (CW rotation needed), slightly harsch contrast and overexposed
                                Best Regards from Germany,
                                Julian S.​

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X