Guillaume BACH Editing advice

[Guillaume BACH]

Perfect thank you very much

[dlowwa]

Thank you very much.

Should I post the last question on another forum?

Thanks again.

Yes, this is the photo processing forum. Try here:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/aircraft-types-and-other-photo-data

[Guillaume BACH]

Thank you very much.

Should I post the last question on another forum?

Thanks again.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I just wanted to know if the following pictures might be accepted.

Should the A380 BA be fit would the "night shot" criteria be required? I think that it is the case but I am not sure.


Additionally, I also have a question regarding my latest picture accepted, shouldn't it be considered as a new "new aircraft registration"? Although the Martin was the same registration I assume that it is now decommissioned.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9898300

Thanks in advance for the help and guidance

G.Bach

1. contrast, centering
2. soft, contrast
3. soft, contrast
4. soft, obstruction
5. soft, contrast

[Guillaume BACH]

Hello,

I just wanted to know if the following pictures might be accepted.

Should the A380 BA be fit would the "night shot" criteria be required? I think that it is the case but I am not sure.


Additionally, I also have a question regarding my latest picture accepted, shouldn't it be considered as a new "new aircraft registration"? Although the Martin was the same registration I assume that it is now decommissioned.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9898300

Thanks in advance for the help and guidance

G.Bach

[Guillaume BACH]

Thanks a lot for your help I will work on those, I will do my best.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I recently got this rejection and I don't understand why the first airplane is considered as "Foreground Clutter"
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7298355

As in the wording of the rejection, the clutter in the foreground is too distracting.

I also wanted to know if the issue with the following rejection has been corrected (see attachment)

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277763

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24682[/ATTACH]

I see little to no difference between the two, and furthermore, I'd also have considered that a soft and perhaps noisy rejection as well.

Finally, I would like to know if the Air New Zeland 777 and the Qantas 330 shots are suitable to be accepted.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24683[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24684[/ATTACH]

Both images are quite soft, and the first also unlevel.

Unfortunately, your images don't quite have the quality for 1600pix, perhaps you might try adding a little sharpening and submitting them at 1280pix instead.

[Guillaume BACH]

Hello,

I recently got this rejection and I don't understand why the first airplane is considered as "Foreground Clutter"

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7298355

I also wanted to know if the issue with the following rejection has been corrected (see attachment)

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277763

Finally, I would like to know if the Air New Zeland 777 and the Qantas 330 shots are suitable to be accepted.





Thanks for your help and your time

Best regards

Guillaume

[Guillaume BACH]

Ok I will try to correct them a bit,
Thanks a lot

[dlowwa]

Hello,
Could I have feedback on these shots please.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15391[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15392[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15393[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15394[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15395[/ATTACH]
Thanks

1. noisy, soft, dark
2. soft/blurry
3. borderline contrast
4. noisy, soft, dark, contrast
5. too far, soft, contrast

2, 3, and 5 might be fixable, especially if you try at a lower resolution like 1200, which will be better to mask the flaws in the images.

[Guillaume BACH]

Thanks a lot

[vcruvinel]

Hello,
Could I have feedback on these shots please.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]15391[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15392[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15393[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15394[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]15395[/ATTACH]
Thanks

All of them appears to be soft.

#1, #4 and #5 also dark, and #2 blurry (wings)

Better wait comment from the screeners but hope this helps.

Best,

Vinicius

[Guillaume BACH]

Editing Advice

Hello,
Could I have feedback on these shots please.

Thanks

[Guillaume BACH]

Thanks a lot.

[dlowwa]

Better now?

Yes.

1. soft/heat haze
2. color, contrast, backlit
3. soft
4. soft, contrast, backlit
5. overprocessed (editing halos), soft