Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

oakwoodman22 editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
    OK, thanks for the feedback. Another attempt then for nr 1 and 3, with more contrast:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15330[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15332[/ATTACH]

    And an aternative for nr 1:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15331[/ATTACH]

    When loading the Tu154 to the DB, do I use Military or Civil?

    Last ones:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15334[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15335[/ATTACH]

    Thanks again.

    Regards, Robert
    1 & 3 these would be considered similar, so please choose one. civil.
    2. still borderline, but acceptable for me
    4 & 5 similar, please choose one

    Comment


    • #17
      Hello,
      Would this one be acceptable, considering it's a new entry to the database?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-GOB.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	850.9 KB
ID:	1027795

      Thanks & regards, Robert

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
        Hello,
        Would this one be acceptable, considering it's a new entry to the database?

        [ATTACH=CONFIG]15504[/ATTACH]

        Thanks & regards, Robert
        A bit soft, and if you have one where the engine isn't quite obstructed, that would be better.

        Comment


        • #19
          OK hopefully this one will do.
          Unobstructed engine and more contrast.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-GOB II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	910.0 KB
ID:	1027797

          Thanks & regards, Robert

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
            OK hopefully this one will do.
            Unobstructed engine and more contrast.

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15506[/ATTACH]

            Thanks & regards, Robert
            Still borderline soft, but might be acceptable for a new reg.

            Comment


            • #21
              Hello dlowwa,

              One last attempt, since I don't want to risk losing a loading position for two weeks.
              Click image for larger version

Name:	UR-GOB III.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	923.9 KB
ID:	1027878
              Is this better now? otherwise I will not post this photo.

              Regards, Robert

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
                Hello dlowwa,

                One last attempt, since I don't want to risk losing a loading position for two weeks.
                [ATTACH=CONFIG]15611[/ATTACH]
                Is this better now? otherwise I will not post this photo.

                Regards, Robert
                Still soft imho, and no longer qualifies as hot since this reg. now has an image in the DB.

                Comment


                • #23
                  time in rejected status

                  Question:

                  Why do my rejected photos remain in the rejected folder for 14 days, while the rejection queue mentions that they will remain there for only for 7 days?

                  Thanks & regards, Robert

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
                    Question:

                    Why do my rejected photos remain in the rejected folder for 14 days, while the rejection queue mentions that they will remain there for only for 7 days?

                    Thanks & regards, Robert
                    Hey Robert,

                    In my rejection list it's all 14 days, so that's rather strange.

                    Best regards,

                    Wilko

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
                      Question:

                      Why do my rejected photos remain in the rejected folder for 14 days, while the rejection queue mentions that they will remain there for only for 7 days?

                      Thanks & regards, Robert
                      14 days is the correct time. 7 days is a typo/error.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Ok thx for the info.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Editing advice oakwoodman22

                          Hello,

                          I received a rejection on below photo.

                          JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                          Is the problem the small items in front of the main landing gear, or the variety of runway signs in general?

                          Thanks & regards, Robert

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by oakwoodman22 View Post
                            Hello,

                            I received a rejection on below photo.

                            JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                            Is the problem the small items in front of the main landing gear, or the variety of runway signs in general?

                            Thanks & regards, Robert
                            As per the message you received from the screener with the rejection: "Easily avoidable obstruction on main gear."

                            Please check your rejection emails, as they often contain comments that will explain the rejection.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              hi,
                              yes the obstruction on the main wheel is the reason for the rejection. Just a tad of planning before taking the shot would have avoided the obstruction

                              Regards
                              Alex

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hello,

                                A request for pre-screaning:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	SU-GEN new.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	921.6 KB
ID:	1031350
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GGTV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1031351
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GIYV.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	889.2 KB
ID:	1031352
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FHAS II.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1031353

                                Thanks & regards, Robert

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X