Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henrik Hedde - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Thank you very much Dana.
    I need your help with the cockpit picture that you had already pre-screened once again, since it was now rejected for being soft.. I tried to improve the sharpening, does it look better now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	antonov3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1027996

    Here's the rejection:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6559974

    Thank you for your help,

    Henrik

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
      Thank you very much Dana.
      I need your help with the cockpit picture that you had already pre-screened once again, since it was now rejected for being soft.. I tried to improve the sharpening, does it look better now?
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]15792[/ATTACH]

      Here's the rejection:
      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6559974

      Thank you for your help,

      Henrik
      There is a bit of noise visible now, but it would be acceptable for me.

      Comment


      • #18
        I agree, looks acceptable to me now

        Comment


        • #19
          Thank you very much Dana and Alex!

          Could I have your opinion on these photos?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	89-62.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	732.5 KB
ID:	1028006
          Click image for larger version

Name:	I-FENI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	708.0 KB
ID:	1028007
          Click image for larger version

Name:	RA-27836.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	617.2 KB
ID:	1028008
          Click image for larger version

Name:	f-azzk.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	668.6 KB
ID:	1028009
          Click image for larger version

Name:	168433.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	639.0 KB
ID:	1028010


          Many thanks in advance and have a good night/evening

          Henrik

          Comment


          • #20
            Hi,
            1) needs CW rotation
            2) tight crop but ok
            3) needs CW rotation, just a bit - What a lovely plane this is !!!!
            4) needs CW rotation, just a bit
            5) needs CW rotation

            Otherwise pictures look ok

            Kind Regards
            Alex

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
              Thank you very much Dana and Alex!

              Could I have your opinion on these photos?

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15809[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15810[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15811[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15812[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]15813[/ATTACH]


              Many thanks in advance and have a good night/evening

              Henrik
              Hi Henrik. My opinion about the photos:

              #1. Horizon (Need CW Rotation)
              #2. Its a bit dark.
              #3. same as #1. Need CW Rotation.
              #4. A bit dark and also need CW Rotation
              #5. dark (see the right side of the histogram) and also need just a little CW rotation.

              Better wait comments from the screeners. But hope this helps.

              Regards,

              Vinicius

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
                ...

                Better wait comments from the screeners. But hope this helps.
                ...
                No need to wait those pics were already prescreened by a crew member on the previous page

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
                  No need to wait those pics were already prescreened by a crew member on the previous page
                  Sorry Alex, I already in the reply page when you answered so when I submit my reply I did not saw you already answered (this is why appears with this part to wait comments).

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius

                    Would the Ilyushin and Yakovlev be "Military" and "Small Prop" or only "Warbird"?
                    The Piaggio is not "Small Prop" though is it?
                    And is the US Navy Boeing be "Cargo" or "BusinessJet" or none of them? I have no idea what this plane is being used for

                    I find it quite hard to figure it out with these planes...

                    Kind regards and thanks in advance
                    Henrik

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                      Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius

                      Would the Ilyushin and Yakovlev be "Military" and "Small Prop" or only "Warbird"?
                      The Piaggio is not "Small Prop" though is it?
                      And is the US Navy Boeing be "Cargo" or "BusinessJet" or none of them? I have no idea what this plane is being used for

                      I find it quite hard to figure it out with these planes...

                      Kind regards and thanks in advance
                      Henrik
                      #1. Military and Helicopter
                      #2. No specific categories
                      #3. Military, Warbird, Small Prop
                      #4. Military, Warbird, Small Prop
                      #5. Just Military

                      Hope this helps, Henrik. Wait the confirmation by the crew of my opinion.

                      Cheers,

                      Vinicius

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Sorry but some mistakes there...

                        #1. Military and Helicopter
                        #2. No specific categories
                        #3. CIVIL Warbird, Small Prop
                        #4. CIVIL Warbird, Small Prop
                        #5. Just Military

                        Both those warbird have a civilian reg and are owned by civilian organisations

                        Alex

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius
                          And yes indeed the IL-2 is really beautiful!!

                          Could I have your opinion on these pictures?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	A350_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	657.8 KB
ID:	1028039
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	d-csnc2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	942.0 KB
ID:	1028040
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	luftwaffe310_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	915.9 KB
ID:	1028041
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	dc-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.3 KB
ID:	1028042
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	N343NA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	753.3 KB
ID:	1028043

                          Many thanks in advance,

                          Henrik

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                            Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius
                            And yes indeed the IL-2 is really beautiful!!

                            Could I have your opinion on these pictures?

                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15854[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15855[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15856[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15857[/ATTACH]
                            [ATTACH=CONFIG]15858[/ATTACH]

                            Many thanks in advance,

                            Henrik
                            Henrik,

                            I think number #1 it's a bit soft from the center to the right, #2 has a overexposed area in the window area (try to adjust using curves) and number #3 maybe it's a little distracting because of the person in the right. The others IMHO looks good.

                            Wait the comments from the screeners too.

                            Regards,

                            Vinicius

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              1) Too dark and dull contrast
                              2-3 : both have a total overexposed outside and would be rejected. To avoid it, set the exposure on the outside and use a fill flash to lit the inside
                              4) and 5) okay

                              Regards
                              Alex

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Thank you very much! So you think the two cockpit photos could still be "saved" then ?

                                Another question regarding 4) and 5) : Does the DC 3 need the Warbird/Vintage category? And is it a special scheme because of the ad stickers? Furthermore 5) should be small prop and Warbird, right?

                                Thanks again for your help

                                Henrik

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X