Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henrik Hedde - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi!
    Hope you're all doing well. I have five photos which I'd like to have some advice on.
    Many thanks in advance

    //Henrik

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tc-jjv.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	511.9 KB
ID:	1098632
    1) overexposed, oversharpened
    2-5) all of them more or less overexposed and soft

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hi!
    Hope you're all doing well. I have five photos which I'd like to have some advice on.
    Many thanks in advance

    //Henrik

    Click image for larger version

Name:	tc-jjv.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	511.9 KB
ID:	1098632
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • meneses24
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Thanks a lot Dana, I added some more Contrast to them now.

    Here are some two other photos that I'm not sure about. Thanks for any advice!

    Best regards,

    Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	b-ljf.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	353.3 KB
ID:	1090465
    Henrik, the attached 744F shows excessive heat distortion.

    The Cathay 748 could have a little more contrast/saturation

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Thanks a lot Dana, I added some more Contrast to them now.

    Here are some two other photos that I'm not sure about. Thanks for any advice!

    Best regards,

    Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	b-ljf.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	353.3 KB
ID:	1090465
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi!
    Thanks Dana for your help. I suppose the Lithuanian was just too far away eventually.

    Here are five photos I would love some advice on.

    Thank you very much in advance!

    //Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	hb-all_Prescreen.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	393.9 KB
ID:	1090343
    Contrast is a bit low, and a couple of them have specks (probably bird) that you'll want to remove, but otherwise would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hi!
    Thanks Dana for your help. I suppose the Lithuanian was just too far away eventually.

    Here are five photos I would love some advice on.

    Thank you very much in advance!

    //Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	hb-all_Prescreen.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	393.9 KB
ID:	1090343
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi! Thanks for your advice. I tried to fix the exposure a bit and hope they'll be fine now.

    What do you think about these two?

    Thanks for any advice!

    //Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	yl-csk.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	314.8 KB
ID:	1089178
    1. soft/blurry
    2. borderline soft, poor dust removal

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hi! Thanks for your advice. I tried to fix the exposure a bit and hope they'll be fine now.

    What do you think about these two?

    Thanks for any advice!

    //Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	yl-csk.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	314.8 KB
ID:	1089178
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hello, thanks for your help!

    A quick question about this reject. Does it look fine now?
    Dust removal seems to have been done better, but there is still dust above wing and halos around tail.

    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Furthermore I have three photos which I hope are good. Thanks in advance //Henrik
    Other than overexposure and possible dust (removal) issues, should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hello, thanks for your help!

    A quick question about this reject. Does it look fine now?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8111180

    Furthermore I have three photos which I hope are good. Thanks in advance //Henrik

    Click image for larger versionName:	d-aidn_2.jpgViews:	0Size:	547.3 KBID:	1088783
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

    Many thanks in advance!
    Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
    1. dirty. probably bugs, but should be removed.
    2-3 borderline overexposed
    5. dirty

    4. can't be uploaded, so no comment.

    Leave a comment:


  • NYspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

    Many thanks in advance!
    Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
    South African needed to be rotated clockwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

    Many thanks in advance!
    Henrik
    Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hello! Thanks for your help, hope the screeners like the motive then

    I have tried to improve some rejected shots and would like to have your opinion whether they look better now. I don't quite know what was wrong with the Emirates A380 though. Maybe you can help.
    All likely to be rejected again, as I don't see any big differences with the rejected versions, and where you have tried to remove dust/vignetting it has been done poorly and could result in additional overprocessed rejections.

    Leave a comment:


  • yousaf
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hello! Thanks for your help, hope the screeners like the motive then

    I have tried to improve some rejected shots and would like to have your opinion whether they look better now. I don't quite know what was wrong with the Emirates A380 though. Maybe you can help.

    Thanks a lot in advance!
    Henrik

    ANA 773 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8059387
    EK 77F https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051628
    Helicopter https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051520
    DHL AB6 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051509
    EK 388 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8029397

    Click image for larger version  Name:	JA789A.jpg Views:	0 Size:	380.8 KB ID:	1087365
    For ANA check Histogram, it is overexposed.
    Sky cargo, also overexposed, check Histogram, peak on right.
    Helicopter Again clear vignetting top right, top left and bottom left corner are dark.
    All images have dust spots.
    For editing check http://seahawkgfx.de/Editingguide.pdf
    for removing dust spots read page 25.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X