Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henrik Hedde - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Hi Dana, thanks for your help!

    I've tried to improve 1 and 4 do they look better now? I guess cut off would be because of incorrect cropping, right?

    If you say CW do you mean it might be unlevel towards CW or that I should level it CW?

    Then I have another photo of which I don't know if it's creative enough to be on Jetphotos

    Thanks for any advice!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	westjet_hooters.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1.17 MB
ID:	1085116
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
      I've tried to improve 1 and 4 do they look better now? I guess cut off would be because of incorrect cropping, right?
      Crop is better on both, but both still borderline for contrast and second has some oversharpened spots.

      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
      If you say CW do you mean it might be unlevel towards CW or that I should level it CW?
      CW = clockwise (rotation).

      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
      Then I have another photo of which I don't know if it's creative enough to be on Jetphotos
      Aircraft is much too small (far) in the frame.


      Comment


      • #78
        Thanks a lot for your help! I got a reject for invalid hot and bad info. What should I choose instead of D-AIKF (the first plane in the photo)? Which categories are missing?
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8009254

        Apart of that I can't see the rejection reasons in my screening results mails I get from jp.net anymore. Has anyone else experienced the same thing? How can I change it? Thanks a lot in advance
        //Henrik

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
          Thanks a lot for your help! I got a reject for invalid hot and bad info. What should I choose instead of D-AIKF (the first plane in the photo)? Which categories are missing?
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8009254

          Apart of that I can't see the rejection reasons in my screening results mails I get from jp.net anymore. Has anyone else experienced the same thing? How can I change it? Thanks a lot in advance
          //Henrik
          Should be uploaded as Airport Overview - Ramp. Image is also oversharpened.

          Comment


          • #80
            Thanks Dana, changed it now! Should i also tick "Airport overview" under Categories (photo specific) then?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	rampffm.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	543.5 KB
ID:	1085273
            How should this photo be uploaded? Ramp as well or the first aircraft (D-AINE)? Thanks for your help!

            Henrik

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
              Thanks Dana, changed it now! Should i also tick "Airport overview" under Categories (photo specific) then?
              Click image for larger version

Name:	rampffm.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	543.5 KB
ID:	1085273
              How should this photo be uploaded? Ramp as well or the first aircraft (D-AINE)? Thanks for your help!

              Henrik
              Usually the cut off is if the aircraft takes up more or less than 50% of the fram. Here looks like just under 50%.

              Comment


              • #82
                Thanks Dana, I uploaded it as „Ramp“
                I‘m a bit confused about this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8009797 how should the photo be rotated? Note that the reef in the picture is not the horizon so quite difficult to see the horizon to me. Thank you very much for any help

                best regards
                Henrik

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                  Thanks Dana, I uploaded it as „Ramp“
                  I‘m a bit confused about this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8009797 how should the photo be rotated? Note that the reef in the picture is not the horizon so quite difficult to see the horizon to me. Thank you very much for any help

                  best regards
                  Henrik
                  The horizon itself is visible, and not level. It needs a little CW rotation.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Hi! Thanks for your help, I tried to improve the shot among some other rejections. Would like to have some advice if the photos look better now. I will add the rejections as well to see a difference.
                    Thank you very much in advance!
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7991484
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7991485
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8004281
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8005628

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	n532vl_new.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	751.4 KB
ID:	1085614


                    Best regards,
                    Henrik
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                      Hi! Thanks for your help, I tried to improve the shot among some other rejections. Would like to have some advice if the photos look better now. I will add the rejections as well to see a difference.
                      Thank you very much in advance!
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7991484
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7991485
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8004281
                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8005628

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	n532vl_new.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	751.4 KB
ID:	1085614


                      Best regards,
                      Henrik
                      1 & 5 borderline horizon (CW)
                      2. ok for me
                      3. horizon (CW)
                      4. soft

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X