Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henrik Hedde - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Good afternoon and thanks a lot for the advice on the ANZ shot!

    I took a photo of a spotting location and was wondering whether a) the shot is fine as it is? I tried to match all the criteria in the guidelines. and b) how the vehicle license plate should be blurred? I tried two different ways, which would be correct?

    Thanks a lot in advance!

    Henrik
    Click image for larger version  Name:	spottinglocation2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.67 MB ID:	1087047
    Motive will be a subjective thing. As long as you provide adequate info about the location, could be acceptable. The other care plates will need to be blurred as well. For quality, image is suffering from oversharpening, and noise/compression.

    Comment


    • #92
      Hello! Thanks for your help, hope the screeners like the motive then

      I have tried to improve some rejected shots and would like to have your opinion whether they look better now. I don't quite know what was wrong with the Emirates A380 though. Maybe you can help.

      Thanks a lot in advance!
      Henrik

      ANA 773 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8059387
      EK 77F https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051628
      Helicopter https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051520
      DHL AB6 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051509
      EK 388 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8029397

      Click image for larger version

Name:	JA789A.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	380.8 KB
ID:	1087365
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
        Hello! Thanks for your help, hope the screeners like the motive then

        I have tried to improve some rejected shots and would like to have your opinion whether they look better now. I don't quite know what was wrong with the Emirates A380 though. Maybe you can help.

        Thanks a lot in advance!
        Henrik

        ANA 773 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8059387
        EK 77F https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051628
        Helicopter https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051520
        DHL AB6 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8051509
        EK 388 https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8029397

        Click image for larger version  Name:	JA789A.jpg Views:	0 Size:	380.8 KB ID:	1087365
        For ANA check Histogram, it is overexposed.
        Sky cargo, also overexposed, check Histogram, peak on right.
        Helicopter Again clear vignetting top right, top left and bottom left corner are dark.
        All images have dust spots.
        For editing check http://seahawkgfx.de/Editingguide.pdf
        for removing dust spots read page 25.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
          Hello! Thanks for your help, hope the screeners like the motive then

          I have tried to improve some rejected shots and would like to have your opinion whether they look better now. I don't quite know what was wrong with the Emirates A380 though. Maybe you can help.
          All likely to be rejected again, as I don't see any big differences with the rejected versions, and where you have tried to remove dust/vignetting it has been done poorly and could result in additional overprocessed rejections.

          Comment


          • #95
            Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

            Many thanks in advance!
            Henrik
            Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
              Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

              Many thanks in advance!
              Henrik
              Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
              South African needed to be rotated clockwise.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                Hi! I tried the ANA once again and would like to have your opinion if it would be acceptable now, as well as some other shots.

                Many thanks in advance!
                Henrik
                Click image for larger version

Name:	8263.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	443.1 KB
ID:	1088165
                1. dirty. probably bugs, but should be removed.
                2-3 borderline overexposed
                5. dirty

                4. can't be uploaded, so no comment.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Hello, thanks for your help!

                  A quick question about this reject. Does it look fine now?

                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8111180

                  Furthermore I have three photos which I hope are good. Thanks in advance //Henrik

                  Click image for larger versionName:	d-aidn_2.jpgViews:	0Size:	547.3 KBID:	1088783
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                    Hello, thanks for your help!

                    A quick question about this reject. Does it look fine now?
                    Dust removal seems to have been done better, but there is still dust above wing and halos around tail.

                    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                    Furthermore I have three photos which I hope are good. Thanks in advance //Henrik
                    Other than overexposure and possible dust (removal) issues, should be ok.

                    Comment


                    • Hi! Thanks for your advice. I tried to fix the exposure a bit and hope they'll be fine now.

                      What do you think about these two?

                      Thanks for any advice!

                      //Henrik
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	yl-csk.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	314.8 KB
ID:	1089178
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                        Hi! Thanks for your advice. I tried to fix the exposure a bit and hope they'll be fine now.

                        What do you think about these two?

                        Thanks for any advice!

                        //Henrik
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	yl-csk.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	314.8 KB
ID:	1089178
                        1. soft/blurry
                        2. borderline soft, poor dust removal

                        Comment


                        • Hi!
                          Thanks Dana for your help. I suppose the Lithuanian was just too far away eventually.

                          Here are five photos I would love some advice on.

                          Thank you very much in advance!

                          //Henrik
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	hb-all_Prescreen.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	393.9 KB
ID:	1090343
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                            Hi!
                            Thanks Dana for your help. I suppose the Lithuanian was just too far away eventually.

                            Here are five photos I would love some advice on.

                            Thank you very much in advance!

                            //Henrik
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	hb-all_Prescreen.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	393.9 KB
ID:	1090343
                            Contrast is a bit low, and a couple of them have specks (probably bird) that you'll want to remove, but otherwise would be ok for me.

                            Comment


                            • Thanks a lot Dana, I added some more Contrast to them now.

                              Here are some two other photos that I'm not sure about. Thanks for any advice!

                              Best regards,

                              Henrik
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	b-ljf.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	353.3 KB
ID:	1090465
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
                                Thanks a lot Dana, I added some more Contrast to them now.

                                Here are some two other photos that I'm not sure about. Thanks for any advice!

                                Best regards,

                                Henrik
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	b-ljf.jpg
Views:	9
Size:	353.3 KB
ID:	1090465
                                Henrik, the attached 744F shows excessive heat distortion.

                                The Cathay 748 could have a little more contrast/saturation

                                Cheers

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X