Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henrik Hedde - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Thank you very much for your help!

    What about this one?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ln-nhg.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	923.5 KB
ID:	1029066

    Have a nice day

    Henrik

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hi! Could I have some advice on the following pictures?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17042[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17043[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17044[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17045[/ATTACH]


    Thank you very much in advance //Henrik
    First needs a little CW rotation; otherwise don't see any major issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hi! Could I have some advice on the following pictures?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ei-fhn.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1029055
    Click image for larger version

Name:	yl-bai.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	980.0 KB
ID:	1029056
    Click image for larger version

Name:	yu-apf.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1029057
    Click image for larger version

Name:	vp-bax.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	865.1 KB
ID:	1029058


    Thank you very much in advance //Henrik

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Hello!

    I would like to have your advice on the following pictures.

    Thank you very much in advance and have a nice sunday!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16329[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16330[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16331[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16332[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]16333[/ATTACH]
    Hi

    All of your pics #1-#5 have issues with overprocessing (visible halos especially around the tail) and CMOS-dust spots. Sharpening and Exposure looks OK to me.
    For #4 the horizon seems to be leaning to the left (so CW rotation is needed here) as there is a slightly slope in RWY18.

    Have a nice evening!
    Last edited by Julian S.; 2018-06-03, 20:23.

    Leave a comment:


  • olandes269
    replied
    Hello

    I'm not screener.

    1 soft , dirty

    2 seems OK but dirty scan and bird

    3 seems OK but dirty scan

    4 soft, dirty

    5 dark, dirty

    If you prefer, wait advice a screener

    Olivier

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Hello!

    I would like to have your advice on the following pictures.

    Thank you very much in advance and have a nice sunday!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	b-bpo.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	778.5 KB
ID:	1028454
    Click image for larger version

Name:	et-avd.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	776.7 KB
ID:	1028455
    Click image for larger version

Name:	zs-snd.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	791.9 KB
ID:	1028456
    Click image for larger version

Name:	su-tmj.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	589.9 KB
ID:	1028457
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ei-gjb.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	667.9 KB
ID:	1028458

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Thank you very much! So you think the two cockpit photos could still be "saved" then ?

    Another question regarding 4) and 5) : Does the DC 3 need the Warbird/Vintage category? And is it a special scheme because of the ad stickers? Furthermore 5) should be small prop and Warbird, right?

    Thanks again for your help

    Henrik

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    1) Too dark and dull contrast
    2-3 : both have a total overexposed outside and would be rejected. To avoid it, set the exposure on the outside and use a fill flash to lit the inside
    4) and 5) okay

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius
    And yes indeed the IL-2 is really beautiful!!

    Could I have your opinion on these pictures?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15854[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15855[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15856[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15857[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15858[/ATTACH]

    Many thanks in advance,

    Henrik
    Henrik,

    I think number #1 it's a bit soft from the center to the right, #2 has a overexposed area in the window area (try to adjust using curves) and number #3 maybe it's a little distracting because of the person in the right. The others IMHO looks good.

    Wait the comments from the screeners too.

    Regards,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius
    And yes indeed the IL-2 is really beautiful!!

    Could I have your opinion on these pictures?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A350_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	657.8 KB
ID:	1028039
    Click image for larger version

Name:	d-csnc2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	942.0 KB
ID:	1028040
    Click image for larger version

Name:	luftwaffe310_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	915.9 KB
ID:	1028041
    Click image for larger version

Name:	dc-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	709.3 KB
ID:	1028042
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N343NA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	753.3 KB
ID:	1028043

    Many thanks in advance,

    Henrik

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Sorry but some mistakes there...

    #1. Military and Helicopter
    #2. No specific categories
    #3. CIVIL Warbird, Small Prop
    #4. CIVIL Warbird, Small Prop
    #5. Just Military

    Both those warbird have a civilian reg and are owned by civilian organisations

    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by FRA/ARNspotter View Post
    Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius

    Would the Ilyushin and Yakovlev be "Military" and "Small Prop" or only "Warbird"?
    The Piaggio is not "Small Prop" though is it?
    And is the US Navy Boeing be "Cargo" or "BusinessJet" or none of them? I have no idea what this plane is being used for

    I find it quite hard to figure it out with these planes...

    Kind regards and thanks in advance
    Henrik
    #1. Military and Helicopter
    #2. No specific categories
    #3. Military, Warbird, Small Prop
    #4. Military, Warbird, Small Prop
    #5. Just Military

    Hope this helps, Henrik. Wait the confirmation by the crew of my opinion.

    Cheers,

    Vinicius

    Leave a comment:


  • FRA/ARNspotter
    replied
    Thank you very much Alex and Vinicius

    Would the Ilyushin and Yakovlev be "Military" and "Small Prop" or only "Warbird"?
    The Piaggio is not "Small Prop" though is it?
    And is the US Navy Boeing be "Cargo" or "BusinessJet" or none of them? I have no idea what this plane is being used for

    I find it quite hard to figure it out with these planes...

    Kind regards and thanks in advance
    Henrik

    Leave a comment:


  • vcruvinel
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    No need to wait those pics were already prescreened by a crew member on the previous page
    Sorry Alex, I already in the reply page when you answered so when I submit my reply I did not saw you already answered (this is why appears with this part to wait comments).

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by vcruvinel View Post
    ...

    Better wait comments from the screeners. But hope this helps.
    ...
    No need to wait those pics were already prescreened by a crew member on the previous page

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X