Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these any better? Also, for future reference, how does one correct contrast issues on a picture?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17700[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17701[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17702[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17703[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17705[/ATTACH]
    In this specific case, I would guess it's due to whatever you are doing in your editing, be it boosting the shadows, or playing with the curves. The weak contrast goes hand in hand with the overprocessing. Figure out which step in your process is causing it, eliminate that step, and you will have fixed two of the problems at the same time.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    These would all be rejected for soft, contrast, and overprocessed.
    Are these any better? Also, for future reference, how does one correct contrast issues on a picture?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050925-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	675.5 KB
ID:	1029565Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050555-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	726.1 KB
ID:	1029566Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050843-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	703.3 KB
ID:	1029567Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050962-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	735.3 KB
ID:	1029568Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060003-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.7 KB
ID:	1029569

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures, and would like to know if any of these would be accepted into the database/what improvements should be made. Thanks in advance for the help!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17692[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17693[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17694[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17695[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]17696[/ATTACH]
    These would all be rejected for soft, contrast, and overprocessed.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures, and would like to know if any of these would be accepted into the database/what improvements should be made. Thanks in advance for the help!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050925-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	663.9 KB
ID:	1029559Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050555-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	696.3 KB
ID:	1029560Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050843-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	684.7 KB
ID:	1029561Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050962-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	687.4 KB
ID:	1029562Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060003-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	685.1 KB
ID:	1029563

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are they any better now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17125[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]17126[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]17127[/ATTACH]
    As I said, since these are not the final images you will be submitting, it's pointless to comment on their chances of acceptance.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Can't give acceptance chances on un-edited images but these do look terribly soft/blurry.
    Are they any better now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050172-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1029135 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050209-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	967.5 KB
ID:	1029136 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050183-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	927.1 KB
ID:	1029137

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be accepted into the database? Thanks again for the help!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17123[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17122[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]17124[/ATTACH]
    Can't give acceptance chances on un-edited images but these do look terribly soft/blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be accepted into the database? Thanks again for the help!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050172-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	837.3 KB
ID:	1029133
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050209-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	735.4 KB
ID:	1029132
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1050183-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	659.5 KB
ID:	1029134

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hi, I'd like to know if any of these pictures would be accepted into the database, and if not, what I should change. Thanks in advance for all the help!

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]15742[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15743[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15744[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]15745[/ATTACH]
    1: backlit
    2: Looks OK, at the verge of being backlit though
    3: OK
    4: Noise, weird contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    started a topic Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

    Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

    Hi, I'd like to know if any of these pictures would be accepted into the database, and if not, what I should change. Thanks in advance for all the help!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040300-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	298.7 KB
ID:	1045593 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040428-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	471.4 KB
ID:	1045594 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040619-1-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	331.8 KB
ID:	1045595 Click image for larger version

Name:	P1040632-1-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	356.5 KB
ID:	1045596
Working...
X