Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.
    Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.4 KB
ID:	1041177Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	503.0 KB
ID:	1041178Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	619.4 KB
ID:	1041179Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	677.4 KB
ID:	1041180Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.4 KB
ID:	1041181

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
      Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]26728[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26729[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26730[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26731[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26732[/ATTACH]
      Same as before, borderline soft. Noise is only really an issue for #4, and I'd suggest lowering the ISO next time you shoot on a sunny day like that. No need to have ISO400 & 1/4000 shutter speed to capture these aircraft.

      Comment


      • #33
        Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!

        Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070974-1.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	659.3 KB
ID:	1077682
        Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070966-1.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	656.4 KB
ID:	1077681
        Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070996-1.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	649.8 KB
ID:	1077679
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
          Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!
          1. contrast. not fixable.
          2. contrast, horizon. not fixable.
          3. horizon (needs CCW), borderline soft

          Comment


          • #35
            Hello! I've recently taken some new pictures after a long break and would like to have the following images prescreened. Would any of these pictures make the cut? If not, what improvements would I have to make/which direction should I be taking when refining these pictures? Thanks in advance for the help!

            Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090775.jpg Views:	0 Size:	662.3 KB ID:	1138812Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090803.jpg Views:	0 Size:	729.5 KB ID:	1138814Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090865.jpg Views:	0 Size:	771.6 KB ID:	1138816Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090886.jpg Views:	0 Size:	762.7 KB ID:	1138818Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090946.jpg Views:	0 Size:	723.5 KB ID:	1138820

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
              Hello! I've recently taken some new pictures after a long break and would like to have the following images prescreened. Would any of these pictures make the cut? If not, what improvements would I have to make/which direction should I be taking when refining these pictures?
              Soft/blurry, overexposed, and vignetting. All would be rejected. The latter two might be fixable, the former maybe not.

              Comment

              Working...
              X