Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!
    1. contrast. not fixable.
    2. contrast, horizon. not fixable.
    3. horizon (needs CCW), borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070974-1.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	659.3 KB
ID:	1077682
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070966-1.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	656.4 KB
ID:	1077681
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070996-1.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	649.8 KB
ID:	1077679
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26728[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26729[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26730[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26731[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26732[/ATTACH]
    Same as before, borderline soft. Noise is only really an issue for #4, and I'd suggest lowering the ISO next time you shoot on a sunny day like that. No need to have ISO400 & 1/4000 shutter speed to capture these aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.
    Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.4 KB
ID:	1041177Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	503.0 KB
ID:	1041178Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	619.4 KB
ID:	1041179Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	677.4 KB
ID:	1041180Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.4 KB
ID:	1041181

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these any better?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26714[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26715[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26716[/ATTACH]
    Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.
    Are these any better?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.8 KB
ID:	1041167Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.2 KB
ID:	1041168Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	635.4 KB
ID:	1041169Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	739.0 KB
ID:	1041170Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	568.2 KB
ID:	1041171

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26702[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26703[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26704[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26705[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26706[/ATTACH]
    Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.7 KB
ID:	1041157Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	499.3 KB
ID:	1041158Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	611.4 KB
ID:	1041159Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.7 KB
ID:	1041160Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	553.6 KB
ID:	1041161

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Alright, I've attempted to fix the softness once again. Are they passable this time around, or do they still suffer from the same issue?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26506[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26507[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26508[/ATTACH]
    Yes all still soft, the first two especially.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    These are better, but would still likely be rejected for soft. Without seeing the originals, I couldn't tell you exactly what the issue was.
    Alright, I've attempted to fix the softness once again. Are they passable this time around, or do they still suffer from the same issue?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.8 KB
ID:	1040983Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	556.2 KB
ID:	1040984Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	599.4 KB
ID:	1040985

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, sorry for being a bit annoying with this specific batch of pictures, but are these any better regarding the softness? At this point, is it more of a blurry type of problem, or is it really just softness? Also, for the previous issues regarding TS (dust spots, vignetting), have those been fixed or are they still there? Thanks once again for your insightful comments, it's much appreciated!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26495[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26496[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26497[/ATTACH]
    These are better, but would still likely be rejected for soft. Without seeing the originals, I couldn't tell you exactly what the issue was.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    All images still soft, especially the first two.
    Hello again, sorry for being a bit annoying with this specific batch of pictures, but are these any better regarding the softness? At this point, is it more of a blurry type of problem, or is it really just softness? Also, for the previous issues regarding TS (dust spots, vignetting), have those been fixed or are they still there? Thanks once again for your insightful comments, it's much appreciated!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	515.0 KB
ID:	1040972Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	522.8 KB
ID:	1040973Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	567.9 KB
ID:	1040974

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, is this version any better? For TS I think I removed the dust spot you were talking about, but am not sure as to whether or not I actually removed it, or if just staring at the picture too long tricked me into seeing things. I did use the "visualize spots" tool in Lightroom to see if I could spot it, but couldn't really see anything that didn't look like a cloud formation from the background. Also, seeing as it has been 24 hours since I first sent these pictures in (please correct me if I'm wrong), I was wondering if you could also have a look at the KLM A330 below. Thanks again for the insight and help!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26474[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26475[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26476[/ATTACH]
    All images still soft, especially the first two.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Both still quite soft (would probably also benefit from increased contrast as well). Vignetting and at least one dust spot above engine remain on TS.
    Hello again, is this version any better? For TS I think I removed the dust spot you were talking about, but am not sure as to whether or not I actually removed it, or if just staring at the picture too long tricked me into seeing things. I did use the "visualize spots" tool in Lightroom to see if I could spot it, but couldn't really see anything that didn't look like a cloud formation from the background. Also, seeing as it has been 24 hours since I first sent these pictures in (please correct me if I'm wrong), I was wondering if you could also have a look at the KLM A330 below. Thanks again for the insight and help!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060911-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	494.5 KB
ID:	1040952Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060825-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	500.3 KB
ID:	1040953Click image for larger version

Name:	P1060870-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	533.6 KB
ID:	1040954

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these any better? For the TS one, I managed to find a small dust spot towards the top, but otherwise, I can't see any others. If there are more, where are they on the picture? Thanks again!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26454[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26455[/ATTACH]
    Both still quite soft (would probably also benefit from increased contrast as well). Vignetting and at least one dust spot above engine remain on TS.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X