Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - YULplanespotting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello, I'm looking to get some prescreening/editing advice on these photos.
    1-2. soft, centering
    3. soft
    4. soft, overexposed, centering
    5. soft

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello, I'm looking to get some prescreening/editing advice on these photos. Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1120428.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	466.2 KB
ID:	1198931Click image for larger version

Name:	P1120507-Edit.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	491.5 KB
ID:	1198932Click image for larger version

Name:	P1130004.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	573.4 KB
ID:	1198930Click image for larger version

Name:	P1120646-Edit.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	719.6 KB
ID:	1198929Click image for larger version

Name:	P1120974.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	585.4 KB
ID:	1198928

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hi, I'm looking to get some prescreening/editing advice on these photos. Thanks in advance for the help!
    Soft, centering, noisy, overexposed.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hi, I'm looking to get some prescreening/editing advice on these photos. Thanks in advance for the help!

    Click image for larger version  Name:	P1120049-4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	635.4 KB ID:	1193062Click image for larger version  Name:	P1110997.jpg Views:	0 Size:	712.9 KB ID:	1193063Click image for larger version  Name:	P1110982.jpg Views:	0 Size:	664.1 KB ID:	1193064Click image for larger version  Name:	P1110969.jpg Views:	0 Size:	715.5 KB ID:	1193065

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello! I've recently taken some new pictures after a long break and would like to have the following images prescreened. Would any of these pictures make the cut? If not, what improvements would I have to make/which direction should I be taking when refining these pictures?
    Soft/blurry, overexposed, and vignetting. All would be rejected. The latter two might be fixable, the former maybe not.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello! I've recently taken some new pictures after a long break and would like to have the following images prescreened. Would any of these pictures make the cut? If not, what improvements would I have to make/which direction should I be taking when refining these pictures? Thanks in advance for the help!

    Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090775.jpg Views:	0 Size:	662.3 KB ID:	1138812Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090803.jpg Views:	0 Size:	729.5 KB ID:	1138814Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090865.jpg Views:	0 Size:	771.6 KB ID:	1138816Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090886.jpg Views:	0 Size:	762.7 KB ID:	1138818Click image for larger version  Name:	P1090946.jpg Views:	0 Size:	723.5 KB ID:	1138820

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!
    1. contrast. not fixable.
    2. contrast, horizon. not fixable.
    3. horizon (needs CCW), borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again, would any of these pictures be passable? If not, what improvements would I have to make? Thanks in advance for the help!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070974-1.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	659.3 KB
ID:	1077682
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070966-1.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	656.4 KB
ID:	1077681
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070996-1.jpg
Views:	135
Size:	649.8 KB
ID:	1077679
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26728[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26729[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26730[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26731[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26732[/ATTACH]
    Same as before, borderline soft. Noise is only really an issue for #4, and I'd suggest lowering the ISO next time you shoot on a sunny day like that. No need to have ISO400 & 1/4000 shutter speed to capture these aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.
    Are these still acceptable? I've sort of tried to cut back on the slight adjustment I made for the last batch which resulted in some starting to get a bit noisy.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	535.4 KB
ID:	1041177Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	503.0 KB
ID:	1041178Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	619.4 KB
ID:	1041179Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	677.4 KB
ID:	1041180Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.4 KB
ID:	1041181

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Are these any better?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26714[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26715[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26716[/ATTACH]
    Some of them starting to get a bit noisy, but still borderline acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.
    Are these any better?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	546.8 KB
ID:	1041167Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	514.2 KB
ID:	1041168Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	635.4 KB
ID:	1041169Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	739.0 KB
ID:	1041170Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	568.2 KB
ID:	1041171

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26702[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26703[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26704[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26705[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26706[/ATTACH]
    Maybe a touch soft for all of them, but may be passable. If not, should be easy to fix.

    Leave a comment:


  • YULplanespotting
    replied
    Hello again! I'm back with some more pictures. Would any of these be accepted into the database? Thanks once again in advance for the tips!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070404-Edit-2-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.7 KB
ID:	1041157Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070434-Edit-2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	499.3 KB
ID:	1041158Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070461-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	611.4 KB
ID:	1041159Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070469-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	695.7 KB
ID:	1041160Click image for larger version

Name:	P1070526-Edit-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	553.6 KB
ID:	1041161

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by YULplanespotting View Post
    Alright, I've attempted to fix the softness once again. Are they passable this time around, or do they still suffer from the same issue?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26506[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26507[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26508[/ATTACH]
    Yes all still soft, the first two especially.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X