Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Flybull - Pre screening please

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    What do you think of this 3 photo, are Acceptable?

    1# Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_7210-1200.jpg Views:	0 Size:	364.6 KB ID:	1080901


    2#
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_7283-1200.jpg Views:	0 Size:	588.0 KB ID:	1080900

    3#
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_7313-1200.jpg Views:	0 Size:	536.2 KB ID:	1080902
    No they are not.

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    What do you think of this 3 photo, are Acceptable?

    1# Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7210-1200.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	364.6 KB
ID:	1080901


    2#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7283-1200.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	588.0 KB
ID:	1080900

    3#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7313-1200.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	536.2 KB
ID:	1080902
    Thanks in advance
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6037-1200.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	330.2 KB
ID:	1080208
    Thanks in advance
    No, image is dark and very soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6037-1200.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	330.2 KB
ID:	1080208
    Thanks in advance
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    Thanks for the advice, I re-edited the photos do you think are better?
    1. soft, dark, compression
    2. overprocessed (editing halos), compression

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    Thanks for the advice, I re-edited the photos do you think are better?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3924-1200.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	329.1 KB
ID:	1078039

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3883-1200.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	297.1 KB
ID:	1078041
    Thanks in advance
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_3924-1200.jpg Views:	0 Size:	331.1 KB ID:	1077819

    In regards to this photo after some rejections by Undersharpened (Soft) others by Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and Too much or too little contrast
    I edited again and what do you think can be improved ??

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3880-1200.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	244.5 KB
ID:	1077832


    Thanks in advance
    both a bot soft and dark (large part in its own shadow)

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3924-1200.jpg Views:	0 Size:	331.1 KB ID:	1077819

    In regards to this photo after some rejections by Undersharpened (Soft) others by Over Processed / Bad postprocessing and Too much or too little contrast
    I edited again and what do you think can be improved ??

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3880-1200.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	244.5 KB
ID:	1077832


    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_28466.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1077305

    Thanks in advance
    No, it would be rejected for soft/blurry, and possibly contrast as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_28466.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1077305

    Thanks in advance
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    As the weather did not help much and because they were taken at the end of the day I doubt if they will be acceptable, what do you think?

    Thanks in advance
    All have issues with underexposure/contrast. The latter three may be fixable, but I doubt you will be able to do much with the first two.

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    As the weather did not help much and because they were taken at the end of the day I doubt if they will be acceptable, what do you think?

    1#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9579.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	408.5 KB
ID:	1043590

    2#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9636.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	464.6 KB
ID:	1043591

    3#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9675.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	412.2 KB
ID:	1043592

    4#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9693.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	393.5 KB
ID:	1043593

    5#
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9738.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	454.8 KB
ID:	1043594

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello dlowwa

    Thanks for the info

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by flybull View Post
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29142[/ATTACH]

    Thanks in advance
    Borderline for heat haze.

    Leave a comment:


  • flybull
    replied
    Hello

    What do you think of this photo, is Acceptable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6433-1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	739.7 KB
ID:	1043195

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X