ErmakDimon - Prescreen

[crisquijano]

Hello again, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16289[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16290[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16291[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16292[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16293[/ATTACH]

hello.
My honest observations. (not a screener*)
1.A bit dark. contrast. soft on spots.bit low on frame.
2 a bit of heat haze buit passable.
3.contrast. a bitt dark.
4.heat haze in wings
5.a bit of heat haze on stabilizer. 50/50


please wait for an screener for a more solid input-

I hope this helped.

regards
cq

[ErmakDimon]

hello.
My honest observations. (not a screener*)
1.A bit dark. contrast. soft on spots.bit low on frame.
2 a bit of heat haze buit passable.
3.contrast. a bitt dark.
4.heat haze in wings
5.a bit of heat haze on stabilizer. 50/50


please wait for an screener for a more solid input-

I hope this helped.

regards
cq

thanks, corrections made but let's wait for a screener's opinion

[olandes269]

Hello Dimitrii,

Cristian is very good advice and I agree entirely on your last pictures. Generally screeners like Dana, Alex and Gerardo confirm what Cristian says

See you soon

Olivier

[dlowwa]

Hello again, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16289[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16290[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16291[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16292[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16293[/ATTACH]

1. soft/blurry, contrast
2. soft/heat haze, obstruction
3. heat haze. not dark.
4-5 heat haze. not 50/50. please do not submit as they are.

[ErmakDimon]

Hello again JP Team, please prescreen these:











Such a shame about the heat haze on the previous batch, those were my best shots so far. Is there any rule of thumb for heat haze?

Cheers, Dmitrii

[olandes269]

Hello Dimitrii,

I'm not screener.

No rules for heat haze, even in winter they may be present. You are less at altitude than on the ground.

1 seems OK maybe soft

2 seems OK maybe soft

3 dark, soft, you can brighten a little and sharpen

4 bad composition, bottom helicopters bring nothing, get the plane back up so it's centered

5 overexpose, bad composition, heat haze and cut off. the depth of the plane is on the edge of the photo.

Wait for the advice of a screener

Regards

Olivier

[dlowwa]

Hello again JP Team, please prescreen these:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16353[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16354[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16355[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16356[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16357[/ATTACH]

1. ok
2. soft, contrast
3. soft
4. soft
5. blurry

Such a shame about the heat haze on the previous batch, those were my best shots so far. Is there any rule of thumb for heat haze?

Yes: don't expect to have anything accepted where it is visible.

[ErmakDimon]

1. ok
2. soft, contrast
3. soft
4. soft
5. blurry


Yes: don't expect to have anything accepted where it is visible.

Thanks, will try to avoid haze in the future

[ErmakDimon]

Hello again, please prescreen:

[vcruvinel]

Hello again, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16527[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16528[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16529[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16530[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16531[/ATTACH]

Hi,

IMHO all of them lacks contrast and also are soft. Number #4 is also blurry (tail).

Better wait some comments from the crew.

Cheers,

Vinicius.

[ErmakDimon]

Once again hello, please prescreen:











Also, would a rare visit be classed as a hot photo? RAM doesn't fly to ULLI, those were football charters, that's why I'm asking.

Thanks in advance!

[vcruvinel]

Once again hello, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16558[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16559[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16560[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16561[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16562[/ATTACH]

Also, would a rare visit be classed as a hot photo? RAM doesn't fly to ULLI, those were football charters, that's why I'm asking.

Thanks in advance!

Hi.

IMHO:

#1. soft, blurry
#2. contrast, cut off (stabilizer), low in frame
#3. needs CCW rotation
#4. soft, blurry
#5. soft, cut off (stabilizer)

Better wait more comments from the crew and others members.

Cheers,

Vinicius

[LX-A343]

Once again hello, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16558[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16559[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16560[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16561[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]16562[/ATTACH]

Also, would a rare visit be classed as a hot photo? RAM doesn't fly to ULLI, those were football charters, that's why I'm asking.

Thanks in advance!

1: blurry
2: contrast (almost backlit)
3: overexposed, soft
4: OK
5: borderline, but fair acceptance chances

And no, they are not hot.

[ErmakDimon]

Hi again, please prescreen:

[dlowwa]

Hi again, please prescreen:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17095[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17096[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17097[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17098[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]17099[/ATTACH]

1. soft/blurry (tail)
2. contrast, soft, centering, dirty
3-4 soft, contrast, overprocessed, dirty
5. soft/heat hazed, contrast, dirty