Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
kevincargo - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by pdeboer View PostThey are all borderline contrast (fuselage not well lit)
Comment
-
Hey team. I have a pair of new registrations to the DB plus a new aircraft type to the registration on the third image. All of these have some small issues I'm wondering are minor enough to add, namely some heat haze on the first and third, and obstruction & contrast issues on the second. Unfortunately, I was in the small public viewing area for PWK and wasn't able to improve my distance or angle to avoid these. Are these acceptable or should we forget about em?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kevincargo View PostHey team. I have a pair of new registrations to the DB plus a new aircraft type to the registration on the third image. All of these have some small issues I'm wondering are minor enough to add, namely some heat haze on the first and third, and obstruction & contrast issues on the second. Unfortunately, I was in the small public viewing area for PWK and wasn't able to improve my distance or angle to avoid these. Are these acceptable or should we forget about em?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17722[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17723[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17724[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by kevincargo View PostHey everyone - feedback on this set?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17981[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17982[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17983[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17984[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]17985[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Hey, a quick question about obstruction. I submitted this one as a new registration this morning, full well understanding the risks of rejection with, say, the contrast of this image, knowing that sometime leniencies are given to new regs in the DB (but not expected). What I didn't even consider was obstruction caused by the ground equipment. I went back and read the latest guidelines about it and it seems like this is just a case by case decision to be made by the screener as to what feels like too much. Is there a quantifiable amount I should be wary of going forward?
I know the best answer to this is "avoid any obstruction at all" but in situations like this where improving your angle is not possible on a parked aircraft, I did the best I could. Not upset about it, just curious to hear a screener's thought.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kevincargo View PostHey, a quick question about obstruction. I submitted this one as a new registration this morning, full well understanding the risks of rejection with, say, the contrast of this image, knowing that sometime leniencies are given to new regs in the DB (but not expected). What I didn't even consider was obstruction caused by the ground equipment. I went back and read the latest guidelines about it and it seems like this is just a case by case decision to be made by the screener as to what feels like too much. Is there a quantifiable amount I should be wary of going forward?
I know the best answer to this is "avoid any obstruction at all" but in situations like this where improving your angle is not possible on a parked aircraft, I did the best I could. Not upset about it, just curious to hear a screener's thought.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6775536
Comment
-
-
Comment