Two more questions, should I add special scheme to No.1 since it has a special sticker? And also can I not include the tow truck in the photo in order to avoid rejection of cut off? Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adrian Tong - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostTwo more questions, should I add special scheme to No.1 since it has a special sticker? And also can I not include the tow truck in the photo in order to avoid rejection of cut off? Thanks.
Comment
-
Wrong Location
Hi everyone,
Recently uploaded a photo but I mistakenly input the wrong airport. It should be taken at RJBB instead of VHHH. Then i tried to used to "Correct Info" function however it didnt not worked properly. May I kindly ask someone who can correct the location for me? Thank you in advance and sorry for the inconvenience.
Link for the photo:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostHi everyone,
Recently uploaded a photo but I mistakenly input the wrong airport. It should be taken at RJBB instead of VHHH. Then i tried to used to "Correct Info" function however it didnt not worked properly. May I kindly ask someone who can correct the location for me? Thank you in advance and sorry for the inconvenience.
Link for the photo:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9048657
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostHello everyone, I would like to seek some advice from all of you about the following photos. Thanks.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18469[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18470[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18471[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18472[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18473[/ATTACH]
I'm not a screener, but IMHO #1 may be acceptable but contrast probably be an issue for the others.
Cheers,
Vinicius
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostHello everyone, I would like to seek some advice from all of you about the following photos. Thanks.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18469[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18470[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18471[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18472[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18473[/ATTACH]
3/4: fair chances
2/5: lacks contrast
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostHi, may i have some advice for the following photos? Thanks a lot.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18578[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18579[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18580[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18581[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18582[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by LX-A343 View PostOn all of them, the shadows are very strong and lacking details. Try to adjust this. Otherwise they look OK, part from #1, which shows recognizable people.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrian Tong View PostDo you mean I have to raise the shadows? But raising the shadows may cause a rejection too due to lack of contrasts. Thanks again.
Comment
-
Editing advice
Hello, just a few questions that I'm confused about this rejected photo.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Firstly, from the histogram, the photo seems exposed correctly, but the rejection reason showed "Underexposed".
Secondly, this aircraft is in standard Etihad colors, I don't really understand why it is "Categories wrong or missing".
Anyone can help me explain what's going on? Thanks a lot for your help.
Comment
Comment