Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arvin Lienardi - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
    this is my first time editing night photos, anyone can give their opinions?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24016[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24017[/ATTACH]
    Both borderline at best for dark/contrast.

    Comment


    • #32
      Click image for larger version

Name:	bqa 2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	598.3 KB
ID:	1034759
      Click image for larger version

Name:	HS-TJC.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	502.7 KB
ID:	1034760

      are these better?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]24021[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]24022[/ATTACH]

        are these better?
        Not much. There simply isn't enough light on the aircraft to make up for the fact that the sky is still bright.

        Comment


        • #34
          Hi, can anyone shrare their thoughts? This is my first time editing to 1600px size

          Click image for larger version

Name:	MXA 1600.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1034859
          Click image for larger version

Name:	9m-mto one world.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1034860

          and does the 737 considered as night shot?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
            Hi, can anyone shrare their thoughts? This is my first time editing to 1600px size

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24142[/ATTACH]
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]24143[/ATTACH]

            and does the 737 considered as night shot?
            Hello,

            Not a screener , but maybe I can help you.

            The 737 looks pretty good and yes it's a nightshot. Look at the long shadow behind the tail.
            A330 seems a bit blurred/soft to me. Maybe it works at 1280.

            But the crew could have other ideas of course.

            Best Regards.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
              Hi, can anyone shrare their thoughts? This is my first time editing to 1600px size

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]24142[/ATTACH]
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]24143[/ATTACH]

              and does the 737 considered as night shot?
              Both a touch dark, but otherwise ok. Yes, can be Night Shot.

              Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
              A330 seems a bit blurred/soft to me. Maybe it works at 1280.
              Not blurry.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Both a touch dark, but otherwise ok. Yes, can be Night Shot.



                Not blurry.
                how about the horizon level in the 737 shot, i found that to be a tricky angle

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
                  how about the horizon level in the 737 shot, i found that to be a tricky angle
                  See:
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                  otherwise ok.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Can anyone give any adivoce on horizon level in this image, i have doubt wheter to follow the bulding on the background or the runway as reference point?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-HLP CX.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.12 MB
ID:	1035040

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
                      Can anyone give any adivoce on horizon level in this image, i have doubt wheter to follow the bulding on the background or the runway as reference point?

                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]24355[/ATTACH]
                      Maybe a tiny bit of CW needed, but looks pretty close to being ok.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                        Maybe a tiny bit of CW needed, but looks pretty close to being ok.
                        On levelling picture, so its better to take the background building or the runway as reference?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
                          On levelling picture, so its better to take the background building or the runway as reference?
                          Always try to use known vertical structures as a reference. I have yet to see a level runway .
                          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            got the photo rejected for overexposed, have no idea why, the highlights and dark areas looks not washed out

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7282593

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Arvin Lienardi View Post
                              got the photo rejected for overexposed, have no idea why, the highlights and dark areas looks not washed out

                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7282593
                              Check the histogram and you will see, the highlights are blown out.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	pk-gps.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	734.0 KB
ID:	1040139

                                This Garuda A330 have a small panda sticker near the front door, does this aircraft considered to be special scheme? the sticker looks small and not really noticeable.
                                Thanks,

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X