Arvin Lienardi - editing advice

[dlowwa]

im confused by these images that's rejected for centering,
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8038318
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8008258

judging from the center tool, the blank space above and below fuselage is similar? is there tips to get centering right?
Thank you!

Both aircraft are too high. Try to put the fuselage in the center.

[Arvin Lienardi]

im confused by these images that's rejected for centering,
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8038318
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8008258

judging from the center tool, the blank space above and below fuselage is similar? is there tips to get centering right?
Thank you!

[LX-A343]

Hi, may i have a prescreen on these phptos? is the lion air image is considered similar with my photos in the database arleady?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9335803
thanks!,

Borderline contrast, 2nd close to be overexposed.

[Arvin Lienardi]

Hi, may i have a prescreen on these phptos? is the lion air image is considered similar with my photos in the database arleady?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9335803
thanks!,

[LX-A343]

not really sure are those photos are acceptable, does the photo with the SQ A350 taking off in the background should be cropped away or kept
thank you!

Both are backlit and lack contrast. The 2nd photo with the SQ does not work. It would look better if the SQ was above the main subject, not behind.

[Arvin Lienardi]

not really sure are those photos are acceptable, does the photo with the SQ A350 taking off in the background should be cropped away or kept
thank you!

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]27294[/ATTACH]
Does this kind of crop OK or considered as cut off rejection?

I'd crop it a bit closer to the wing on the left side, but otherwise crop should be acceptable. Light is quite poor, however.

[Arvin Lienardi]

Does this kind of crop OK or considered as cut off rejection?

[dlowwa]

Thank you, I just fixed the image to fix the yellow tone, is this better and worthy to be in the queue

Better, but would still be borderline at best for me.

[Arvin Lienardi]

Yes, image is too yellow and missing cargo category. This is a military aircraft, not civilian.

Thank you, I just fixed the image to fix the yellow tone, is this better and worthy to be in the queue

[dlowwa]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7451083

The photos is rejected for color, misssing catergories and bad info. i just want to ask/clarify some stuff.
does the color rejection is due to the image is more to a warmer tone?
should I check the cargo category?

However i have no idea where the bad info rejection come from, i do use the autofill system.

Thank you

Yes, image is too yellow and missing cargo category. This is a military aircraft, not civilian.

[Arvin Lienardi]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7451083

The photos is rejected for color, misssing catergories and bad info. i just want to ask/clarify some stuff.
does the color rejection is due to the image is more to a warmer tone?
should I check the cargo category?

However i have no idea where the bad info rejection come from, i do use the autofill system.

Thank you

[LX-A343]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]25546[/ATTACH]

This Garuda A330 have a small panda sticker near the front door, does this aircraft considered to be special scheme? the sticker looks small and not really noticeable.
Thanks,

Too small for a special scheme.

[Arvin Lienardi]

This Garuda A330 have a small panda sticker near the front door, does this aircraft considered to be special scheme? the sticker looks small and not really noticeable.
Thanks,

[dlowwa]

got the photo rejected for overexposed, have no idea why, the highlights and dark areas looks not washed out

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7282593

Check the histogram and you will see, the highlights are blown out.