Hi!
Can someone take a look at my recent photo and provide feedback?
Thank you in advance!
Jarvis
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whatdjarvis - Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostToo much processing on this one. It would be rejected for contrast, compression, oversharpening, and overprocessed. So far the best of any edits has been the one from post #28.
Thanks for the help dlowwa!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by whatdjarvis View PostTook one more crack at it. Added more sharpening and noise reduction and also tried to address the vignetting.
Thanks again for being so helpful! May just need to start from scratch again.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18033[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostStill a little soft, but definitely better. Vignetting and noise remain an issue.
Thanks again for being so helpful! May just need to start from scratch again.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by whatdjarvis View PostHmmm ok. I took a stab at improving the first one.
This was shot at 1/640, f6.3 so maybe I'm gaining some softness by not having fast enough shutter speed. If they are fairly far off then most likely something has to change in my camera/lens settings or technique.
This one was cropped down a bit so that could explain it.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18032[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostPossibly, but these are not borderline, so a large improvement will be needed.
This was shot at 1/640, f6.3 so maybe I'm gaining some softness by not having fast enough shutter speed. If they are fairly far off then most likely something has to change in my camera/lens settings or technique.
This one was cropped down a bit so that could explain it.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for the quick response! Do you think the soft/contrast could be fixed in post?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by whatdjarvis View PostHello again!
Can a screener take a look at the following below? I hopefully improved from my last batch!
Thank you so much,
Jarvis
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18022[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18023[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18024[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18025[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]18026[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
-
Thanks for the reply! I see what you are talking about now. Yeah I'm giving up on these due to the poor contrast with the sky conditions but this will help me for my next set.
I'll try to get the next ones more sharp and with less noise as well. Plenty to learn!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by whatdjarvis View PostOh! I did not even notice Where are you seeing the spots if you don't mind? Is it possible to clone them out? Maybe due to the poor contrast I could not spot them.
Thanks again for your continued help everyone!
You will be unable to remove the first one since it is actually on the aircraft, but the quality is so poor it's unlikely the image would have ever been accepted anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View PostNo, dirty means dust spots on your sensor. Both images have them.
Thanks again for your continued help everyone!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PrestonFiedler View PostDirty means there are dust spots from the sensor. Equalizing in your editing software will enable you to see them more clearly. Noisy is too much grain. Possibly due to heavy crop, heavy exposure adjustment, or a wide variety of reasons. ISO 125 shouldn't cause a ton of noise straight out of the camera.
Thanks for the info!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: