If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Can you please review these. Specifically the first two regarding :
1) Is the wing shadow over the registration a problem ?
2) Since these were taken at dawn it's ok to have the color temperature yellish ? or should push a bit more light and white ?
#The halos need to be visible on the uploaded version to actually be an issue.
I understand, my problem is realy to see them at naked eye... maybe now with the help of the equalized function I can train the eye a bit.
However, I believe that the best solution, is to not create them to start with.... so I'm applying a (halos) bullet proof processing... that does not create halos
Only the first one is really obvious, but again, the equalized versions are not what will be screened. The halos need to be visible on the uploaded version to actually be an issue.
Thx dlowwa
#The halos need to be visible on the uploaded version to actually be an issue.
I understand, my problem is realy to see them at naked eye... maybe now with the help of the equalized function I can train the eye a bit.
However, I believe that the best solution, is to not create them to start with.... so I'm applying a (halos) bullet proof processing... that does not create halos
#I posted the equalized versions simply because you seemed to be having issues seeing them yourself, or even understanding what I was talking about.
You are 100% correct on both
There are halos and halos.... and I coudln't see these "small" color depressions in the sky...
Then the word "overprocessed" just lead me to look at oversharpen ...
I need now a training course on the Airport's XRay security scanner system...
So let's see if I can start to use the equalize function to post acceptable photos.
1) this clearly shows halos and the borderline problems ..correct ?
2) in this case the borderline is the problem ... correct ?
3,4,5 ) these photos looks ok, regarding halos and borderline.. correct ?
thx again for your time and patience... (I hope) I'll get there one of these days
/rgds
Only the first one is really obvious, but again, the equalized versions are not what will be screened. The halos need to be visible on the uploaded version to actually be an issue.
No, the problem is easy to see with the naked eye. I posted the equalized versions simply because you seemed to be having issues seeing them yourself, or even understanding what I was talking about.
Thx dlowwa
#I posted the equalized versions simply because you seemed to be having issues seeing them yourself, or even understanding what I was talking about.
You are 100% correct on both
There are halos and halos.... and I coudln't see these "small" color depressions in the sky...
Then the word "overprocessed" just lead me to look at oversharpen ...
I need now a training course on the Airport's XRay security scanner system...
So let's see if I can start to use the equalize function to post acceptable photos.
1) this clearly shows halos and the borderline problems ..correct ?
2) in this case the borderline is the problem ... correct ?
3,4,5 ) these photos looks ok, regarding halos and borderline.. correct ?
thx again for your time and patience... (I hope) I'll get there one of these days
ah... no wonder I coudln't identify/notice : (halos, overprocessing) ... I was trying to see them at "naked eye" in the original photo.
While this equalized view is where I should be using to look for the problem.
So, for the other issues : (borderline, contrast, compression ) is there any other view/tool/report that can/should be used to identify them ?
Is there any automated workflow to analyze the quality of a photo ?
thx
/rgds
a.m.
No, the problem is easy to see with the naked eye. I posted the equalized versions simply because you seemed to be having issues seeing them yourself, or even understanding what I was talking about.
ah... no wonder I coudln't identify/notice : (halos, overprocessing) ... I was trying to see them at "naked eye" in the original photo.
While this equalized view is where I should be using to look for the problem.
So, for the other issues : (borderline, contrast, compression ) is there any other view/tool/report that can/should be used to identify them ?
Is there any automated workflow to analyze the quality of a photo ?
I must admit I'm a bit lost now.
The only processing I've applied was a HighPass sharpen filter ( with minimum values ) ..
.. as such I need your help in other to learn identify where the overprocessing can be seen.
are the strong defined black letters the reason of the overprocessing ?
or are the strong primary colors the reason ?
No, same reason as before - editing halos visible around fuselage. Much easier to see equalized:
I must admit I'm a bit lost now.
The only processing I've applied was a HighPass sharpen filter ( with minimum values ) ..
.. as such I need your help in other to learn identify where the overprocessing can be seen.
are the strong defined black letters the reason of the overprocessing ?
or are the strong primary colors the reason ?
Based on your comments I'm now simplifying a bit the overwall processing.
Just a bit of ligth... and a highpass filter to sharpen the plane layer after resizing.
No luminance, no noise reduction, no color balance, no nothing... so, if the end result isn't good, let's move to another photo.
(Additional to that, I'm also expecting that the Autumn's photo season will bring clear photos, due to less haze, clean and cold air. )
Can you please then review these, accordingly to the "new rules"?
Based on your comments I'm now simplifying a bit the overwall processing.
Just a bit of ligth... and a highpass filter to sharpen the plane layer after resizing.
No luminance, no noise reduction, no color balance, no nothing... so, if the end result isn't good, let's move to another photo.
(Additional to that, I'm also expecting that the Autumn's photo season will bring clear photos, due to less haze, clean and cold air. )
Can you please then review these, accordingly to the "new rules"?
Thanks again for your time and help
/rgds
Attached Files
Last edited by a.m.; 2018-09-05, 22:43.
Reason: replace photo
#Shadows not an issue on any of them
Great. This will simplify a lot my processing workflow.
Now, let's look at the overprocessed issue.
This has been a recurrent issue and I need some (extra) help to try to correct it.
Specifically TAP planes are prone to this... lots of primary colors, (small) black letters on white background... details, details..
As such, can you please review this set ?
They have no processing/adjust at all, not in camera, not previous to resizing , not after, none at all.
If not what do you suggest ?
1) a tade of sharpening in all the plane ?
2) a tade of sharpening in specific locals : everywhere... but not in letters ?
3) a tade of sharpening just in letters ?
As I've said before, sharpening has nothing to do with the types of halos you're seeing.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: