If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Thx dlowwa. I thought that aligning by the pole , would make the houses very strange (#1 photo) So I tried to align by the houses...
To the left of the photo I believe they are aligned... to the right I believe the distortion, makes them a little lean to left. 0.5 you say ? so does it look ok now ? (#2 Photo)
Thanks again for your time and help
/rgds
a.m.
First is really off as I said it would be. The second is better, but I still might give it another 0.2-0.3 CW, but no more than that.
Thx dlowwa. I thought that aligning by the pole , would make the houses very strange (#1 photo) So I tried to align by the houses...
To the left of the photo I believe they are aligned... to the right I believe the distortion, makes them a little lean to left. 0.5 you say ? so does it look ok now ? (#2 Photo)
Thanks again for your time and help
/rgds
a.m.
Light pole obviously, but I would actually ignore that and look at the buildings in the background. They are also leaning to the left, albeit to a lesser degree. Level those, and don't worry about the light. I'd say at least 0.5 degrees CW is needed.
Now, that the Winter is here and on a harsh weather day ... could these be acceptable ?
At least the contours of the planes looks well defined against the white backdrop.
Sure, the Sun is a bit shy... so, the noise could be a bit to much than the normal.
Thanks again for your time and help
/rgds
a.m.
All would be rejected for soft, noise, compression, and contrast. None have the quality to be submitted at 1920pix.
Now, that the Winter is here and on a harsh weather day ... could these be acceptable ?
At least the contours of the planes looks well defined against the white backdrop.
Sure, the Sun is a bit shy... so, the noise could be a bit to much than the normal.
Both need CCW rotation as the background buildings are leaning right.
Thx dlowwa. ah, damn, my eyes are fooling me (again)...those buildings are so small, that a little window can make the difference.
Going back to the drawing board...
In the first I tried to align using the antenna pole, and in the second the houses as vertical references, it looks this wasn't correct/didn't work.
Anyway, this is a mistake I shouldn't be doing by now. Can you please guide me on solving it ? Should I use other references ? like signs and small poles in the runway ?
thanks again for your time and help (... and Merry Christmas )
/rgds
a.m.
Both need CCW rotation as the background buildings are leaning right.
In the first I tried to align using the antenna pole, and in the second the houses as vertical references, it looks this wasn't correct/didn't work.
Anyway, this is a mistake I shouldn't be doing by now. Can you please guide me on solving it ? Should I use other references ? like signs and small poles in the runway ?
thanks again for your time and help (... and Merry Christmas )
I warned you about this when you asked about the second one in prescreening. In the future, best to sort out such issues before submitting to the queue, especially if they've already been pointed out to you. The verticals are all leaning left = needs CW rotation.
Thx dlowwa
#I warned you about this when you asked about the second one in prescreening.
Believe me, I've applied your recommendation regarding the crop (too far), but didn't understood this horizont level stuff very well.
That's why I've committed the same mistake in another photo... and I believe I've another one in queue, with the same error.
Usually the vertical references are very clear... in this case they are very small, and I've align it badly.
So let's see if I've learn something today and avoid these kind of mistake in the future.
Can you help me understand how two identify it, in order to correct it ?
I tried to align it verticaly. So is this a problem of vertical alignment ? or to low in the frame ?
thanks again for your time and help
/rgds
a.m.
I warned you about this when you asked about the second one in prescreening. In the future, best to sort out such issues before submitting to the queue, especially if they've already been pointed out to you. The verticals are all leaning left = needs CW rotation.
Can you help me understand how two identify it, in order to correct it ?
I tried to align it verticaly. So is this a problem of vertical alignment ? or to low in the frame ?
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
)
Leave a comment: