Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

pre-screen photos at dawn

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Thx dlowwa

    Usually I center the image by centering the plane in the central square
    However for this kind of angle (that I usually don't use) ... by centering it, based in the central square ..it doesn't look good, you as just mentioned.
    So what are the rules of engagement for this kind of angles ? center based on "envelope zone" of the plane ? or center based on the mass center of the plane

    Any one of these is ok

    #1 center of mass center
    #2 envelope center
    #3 center based on central square (original photo)

    /rgds
    thx
    Personal preference of course, but if you're hoping to get it accepted here, #2 would be the way to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    1-2, 4-5 are all poorly centered, and have a couple of soft areas.
    3 is very soft and also compressed
    Thx dlowwa

    Usually I center the image by centering the plane in the central square
    However for this kind of angle (that I usually don't use) ... by centering it, based in the central square ..it doesn't look good, you as just mentioned.
    So what are the rules of engagement for this kind of angles ? center based on "envelope zone" of the plane ? or center based on the mass center of the plane

    Any one of these is ok

    #1 center of mass center
    #2 envelope center
    #3 center based on central square (original photo)

    /rgds
    thx
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Hi dlowwa

    After some months in this hobby, I thought I had learn a couple of things, but unfortunately I keep having rejections like: center, dark, rotation and even softness.

    My confidence is really low nowadays, I'm convinced I've the best photo in the world.. and then it's rejected. So I'm back again to basics, which means I'll bother you with some reviews, I'm sorry for that..

    Can you please then review these ? thx

    /rgds
    a.m.
    1-2, 4-5 are all poorly centered, and have a couple of soft areas.
    3 is very soft and also compressed

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Hi dlowwa

    After some months in this hobby, I thought I had learn a couple of things, but unfortunately I keep having rejections like: center, dark, rotation and even softness.

    My confidence is really low nowadays, I'm convinced I've the best photo in the world.. and then it's rejected. So I'm back again to basics, which means I'll bother you with some reviews, I'm sorry for that..

    Can you please then review these ? thx

    /rgds
    a.m.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Don't know where to report it... so

    Photo https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9334436 is incorrectly registered as CS-TOA - A340... where is should be CS-TUA - A330 Neo

    /rgds
    a.m.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;686175]
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Thx dlowwa
    The latter three should be totally acceptable (with proper edits) - the sun is at a much lower angle and thus much more of the visible side of the aircraft is lit.
    Thx dlowwa
    Every day a new experience... or should I say : damn ?
    This lit "percentage" just caught me off guard. Imagine that I went purposely for a spot UNDER the plane to take the photo... damn, damn & damn
    thanks for the time and help

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    [QUOTE=a.m.;686171]Thx dlowwa
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    There were comments left with your appeal.

    One of them was knew to me "most of the plane is in the shadow". This photo was take from below... so the sun, can't get there.
    It's midday, the sun is just on top ... with a minimum angle to still lit the tail. If see tons of photos with no sun at all... every day , similarly photos are uploaded... didn't knew that this was a reason to reject it.

    #Better to pick a different image with better conditions.
    I'm a bit puzzle, what are better conditions... will these qualify ?
    The first one is shown as taken out of the camera with no corrections..

    thanks again for your time and help

    /rgds
    a.m.
    The latter three should be totally acceptable (with proper edits) - the sun is at a much lower angle and thus much more of the visible side of the aircraft is lit.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Thx dlowwa
    [QUOTE=dlowwa;686170]There were comments left with your appeal.

    One of them was knew to me "most of the plane is in the shadow". This photo was take from below... so the sun, can't get there.
    It's midday, the sun is just on top ... with a minimum angle to still lit the tail. If see tons of photos with no sun at all... every day , similarly photos are uploaded... didn't knew that this was a reason to reject it.

    #Better to pick a different image with better conditions.
    I'm a bit puzzle, what are better conditions... will these qualify ?
    The first one is shown as taken out of the camera with no corrections..

    thanks again for your time and help

    /rgds
    a.m.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Hi dlowwa

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Can you help me understand , why this photo is dark
    There were comments left with your appeal.

    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    ... and what can I do to recover it ?
    Not sure you can recover it as such (poor lighting due to angle + position of sun). If you increase the brightness any more, you're likely to blow out the top part of the fuselage. Better to pick a different image with better conditions.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Hi dlowwa

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    Can you help me understand , why this photo is dark ... and what can I do to recover it ?
    Alternatively is this one a better/ok photo ?

    thx for your time and help

    /rgds
    a.m.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Would be enough for me.
    Thx dlowwa
    /rgds
    a.m.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Thx. Is this ok/enough ?

    /rgds
    a.m.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24937[/ATTACH]
    Would be enough for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Based on the background verticals, appears to need some CCW rotation.
    Thx. Is this ok/enough ?

    /rgds
    a.m.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CS-TJL P5194781.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.52 MB
ID:	1035517

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by a.m. View Post
    Hi dlowwa

    Can you please help me understand and correct this rejection for unlevel ? thx
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    /rgds
    a.m.
    Based on the background verticals, appears to need some CCW rotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • a.m.
    replied
    Hi dlowwa

    Can you please help me understand and correct this rejection for unlevel ? thx
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    /rgds
    a.m.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X