Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alessandros - Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post

    Thank you dlowwa.

    What about this, instead?
    This photo means a lot for me and has been very difficult to realize, besides the poor lighting. Maybe some of you can give advice, if any.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9616_1200.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	878.5 KB
ID:	1080979
    Soft, and contrast is somewhat low.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. too far, contrast
    2. too far, soft/blurry, centering
    3. too far, noisy
    Thank you dlowwa.

    What about this, instead?
    This photo means a lot for me and has been very difficult to realize, besides the poor lighting. Maybe some of you can give advice, if any.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	_DSC9616_1200.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	878.5 KB
ID:	1080979

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Opinion on these?
    1. too far, contrast
    2. too far, soft/blurry, centering
    3. too far, noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Opinion on these?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1456_1200.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	533.7 KB
ID:	1078022Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1705_1200.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	674.0 KB
ID:	1078023Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3617_1200_2.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	879.8 KB
ID:	1078024

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Thank you, are they better now?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29327[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29328[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29329[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29330[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29331[/ATTACH]



    Yea already had a look at their database but looks like that 60 doesn't exist. Actually it doesn't exist on the whole web. I'll ask on their forum, thank you.
    Better, but still a bit weak. May be acceptable as they are, except the first which also has a motive/obstruction issue with the crew member.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Thank you, are they better now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3474_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1043354Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3470_1200_2-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.46 MB
ID:	1043355Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3667_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.70 MB
ID:	1043356Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3672_1200_2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.50 MB
ID:	1043357Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3705_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.71 MB
ID:	1043358

    Yea already had a look at their database but looks like that 60 doesn't exist. Actually it doesn't exist on the whole web. I'll ask on their forum, thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hello again,

    What about these?
    These all have issues with the contrast being too weak.

    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    And for the UH-60 can you give me some help with US Army registrations? I see the 21041 on the tail but there should be another number before, from what I've understood reading around... any tips?
    https://www.scramble.nl/military-database

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Hello again,

    What about these?
    And for the UH-60 can you give me some help with US Army registrations? I see the 21041 on the tail but there should be another number before, from what I've understood reading around... any tips?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3474_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.26 MB
ID:	1043327Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3667_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.66 MB
ID:	1043328Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3672_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.48 MB
ID:	1043329Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3470_1200_2-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.39 MB
ID:	1043330Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3705_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.64 MB
ID:	1043331

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hello,

    May I get an opinion on these?

    Thank you.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26097[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26098[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26099[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26100[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26101[/ATTACH]
    Images are soft and lacking contrast to varying degrees.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Hello,

    May I get an opinion on these?

    Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2481_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.11 MB
ID:	1040620Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2522_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	979.8 KB
ID:	1040621Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2547_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.17 MB
ID:	1040622Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2610_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.20 MB
ID:	1040623Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2624_1200_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.61 MB
ID:	1040624

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    All images are soft, and a bit dark.
    Thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hi guys,

    Would you be so kind to give me an opinion on the followings?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]24562[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24563[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24564[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24565[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]24566[/ATTACH]
    All images are soft, and a bit dark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Hi guys,

    Would you be so kind to give me an opinion on the followings?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1914_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1035213Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1930_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1035214Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1946_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1035215Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1970_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1035216Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2021_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.22 MB
ID:	1035217

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Alessandros View Post
    Hello again gentlemen,

    I would need an opinion on this photos:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]21677[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21678[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21679[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21680[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21681[/ATTACH]

    Thank you
    1. soft, overprocessed (editing halos)
    2. compression
    3. contrast, borderline cut off
    4. contrast
    5. overprocessed, borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Alessandros
    replied
    Hello again gentlemen,

    I would need an opinion on this photos:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0020_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1032826Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0276_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	288.1 KB
ID:	1032827Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0318_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.78 MB
ID:	1032828Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0794_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.28 MB
ID:	1032829Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0803_1200.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1032830

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X